认知闭合需求和大五人格关系的研究被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要为了研究与生俱来的人格特征对人在认识事物过程的认知闭合的影响,选用王孟成等编制的中国大五人格问卷简式版测量大五人格,选用Kruglanski和Webster的认知闭合需求量表(the Need For Closure Scale,NFCS)和印象形成的首因效应来测量认知闭合需求,试图寻找人格和认知闭合需求的关系;此外,研究还特别考察了人格对阅读理解的影响。研究发现:严谨性、外倾性和宜人性与NFCS总分具有显著正相关;在回归分析中,严谨性和外倾性的标准系数显著;大五人格和首因效应没有显著的相关;阅读时间作为中介变量影响了个体对阅读材料的把握程度,即宜人性高的个体阅读时间越长,对材料细节题的回答正确率更高,自信程度更高,而神经质则反之。

作者张皓符德江

机构地区浙江大学心理与行为科学系

出处《荆楚理工学院学报》 2015年第5期73-83,共11页 Journal of Jingchu University of Technology

关键词认知闭合需求大五人格模型印象形成首因效应

分类号 B842.1 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1Webster D M, Kruglanski A W. Individual differences in need for cognitive closure [ J ]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1994,67 (6) : 1 049 - 1 062.
2Webster D M, Kruglanski A W. Cognitive and social con- sequences of the need for cognitive closure [ J ]. European review of social psychology, 1997,8 ( 1 ) : 133 - 173.
3Kruglanski A W, Peri N, Zakai D. Interactive effects of need for closure and initial confidence on social informa- tion seeking [ J ]. Social Cognition, 1991,9 (2) : 127 - 148.
4Mannetti L,Pierro A, Kruglanski A W, et al. A cross cul- tural study of the need for cognitive closure scale: Com- paring its structure in Croatia, Italy, the USA and the Netherlands [ J ]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 2002, (41) :139 - 156.
5Kruglanski A W, Freund T. The freezing and unfreezing of lay - inferences : Effects on impressional primacy, eth- nic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring[ J ]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1983,19 ( 5 ) : 448 - 468.
6Dijksterhuis A, van Knippenverg A, Kruglanski A W, et al. Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1996, (32) : 254 - 270.
7Kruglanski A W, Webster D M, Klem A. Motivated re- sistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information [ J ]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1993,65 (5) :861 - 876.
8刘雪峰,张志学.认知闭合需要研究评述[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(1):51-55. 被引量：36
9Asch S E. Forming impressions of personality [ J ]. Jour- nal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1946, (41) :258 - 290.
10Kruglanski A W. Lay epistemics and human knowl- edge: Cognitive and motivational bases [ M ]. New York : Plenum, 1989.

二级参考文献54

1戴晓阳,吴依泉.NEO-PI-R在16～20岁人群中的应用研究[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(1):14-18. 被引量：21
2Adrian, F., & Ribchester, T. (1995). Tolerance of ambiguity. Current Psychology, 14, 179 - 190.
3Adomo, T W., Frenkel-Bnmswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sandford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. New York: Harper.
4Budner, S. A. (1962). Intolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30, 29 - 50.
5Chiu, C. Y., Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. Y., & Menon, T. (2000). Motivated cultural cognition: The impact of implicit cultural theories on dispositional attribution varies as a function of need for closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 247 - 259.
6de Dreu, C. K. W. (2003). Time pressure and closing of the mind in negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91,280 - 295.
7de Dreu, C. K. W., Koole, S. L., & Oldersma, F. L. (1993). On the seizing and freezing of negotiator inferences: Need for cognitive closure moderates the use of heuristics in negotiation. Personality and Soeial Psychology Bulletin, 25, 34 - 362.
8De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Mannetti, L., & Perro, A. (1999). Motivated cognition and group interaction: Need for closure affects the contents and processes of collective negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 346 - 365.
9Dijksterhuis, A., van Knippenverg, A., Kruglanski, A. W., & Schapter, C. (1996). Motivated social cognition: Need for closure effects on memory and judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 254 - 270.
10Durrheim, K. & Foster, D. (1997). Tolerance of ambiguity as a content specific construct. Personality and Individual Difference, 22, 741 - 750.