期刊文献+

考虑修理结构的舰船部署能力仿真 被引量:4

Simulation analysis of warship deploy ability with maintenance structures involved
下载PDF
导出
摘要 海上环境日益复杂,不仅要关心单艘舰船的部署能力,更要关心多艘舰船可同时部署的能力,以满足不同军事任务的用船需求。针对多艘同型舰船的部署能力问题,分析舰船入役时机、计划修理间隔期及修期控制等因素对同型舰船部署能力的影响,并从军事需求出发,提出多艘同型舰船部署能力的度量指标体系。在此基础上,建立多艘同型舰船部署能力的数学模型,给出同型舰船部署能力的仿真算法,较好地解决了同型舰船部署能力计算困难的问题。最后,通过仿真分析发现,舰船入役时机、计划修理间隔期及修期控制对同型舰船的部署能力具有较大影响,尤其是随着舰船计划修理间隔期的延长,其部署能力呈S形增加,对优化舰船修理结构,提高同型舰船部署能力,降低舰船维修保障费用具有重要意义。 As marine environment becomes increasingly complex, the deployment of warships in differentmilitary tasks, including both single warship deployment as well as multi-warship coordination, is often dis-cussed. This paper analyzes the main factors that influence the deploy ability of warships of the same typewhen the warship comes into service, plans repairing interval, schedules control and etc. Based on the anal-ysis, the measurement indicators for concurrent deploy ability of identical warships are constructed, and thecorresponding model and the simulation algorithm is provided. The proposed approach is seen to be a goodsolution to the difficulties in calculating concurrent deploy ability. Finally, the simulation results suggestthat all the factors are of vital significance to the deploy ability; particularly, as the maintenance interval in-creases, the deploy ability shows S-shape growth. In brief, this approach plays a significant role for optimiz-ing maintenance structures, promoting the deploy ability of identical warships and reducing the mainte-nance cost.
出处 《中国舰船研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期123-128,共6页 Chinese Journal of Ship Research
关键词 舰船 部署能力 修理结构 仿真分析 warship deploy ability maintenance structure simulation analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1ROLAND J Y, JOHN F S, JAMES G K.Aircraft carrier maintenance cycles and their effects [R]. Santa Moni- ca:RAND,2008.
  • 2ROLANDLY J Y, RAJ R, JESSIE R.Impacts of the fleet response plan on surface combatant maintenance [ R ]. Santa Monica : RAND, 2006.
  • 3HALL M. The impact of long-term aircraft carrier maintenance scheduling on the fleet readiness plan [ D ]. California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2004.
  • 4BROWN R L, LAWPHONGPANICH S, SCHRADY D, et al. Forward engagement requirements for US naval forces: new analytical approaches [R]. Washington, DC : Deputy Chief of Naval Operations, 1997.
  • 5张耀辉,郭金茂,单志伟,何瑞.装备预防性维修的维修级别逻辑决策分析方法[J].装甲兵工程学院学报,2008,22(5):40-44. 被引量:7
  • 6程志君,郭波.连续劣化系统的最佳检测与维修策略分析[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(1):193-196. 被引量:16
  • 7何春雨,金家善,孙丰瑞.基于LINGO软件的舰船装备修理级别优化分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2011,45(1):78-82. 被引量:11
  • 8YARDLEY R J, KALLIMANI J G.A methodolgy for es- timating the effect of aircraft carrier operational cycles on the maintenance industrial base[R].Santa Monica: RAND, 2007.
  • 9YARDLEY R J, KALLIMANI J G.Increasing aircraft carrier forward presence: changing the length of the maintenance cycle [ R ] .Santa Monica: RAND, 2008.
  • 10朱晓军,张涛,彭飞,闵少松.基于编队时间序列的舰船修理结构模型[J].系统工程与电子技术,2012,34(11):2285-2289. 被引量:4

二级参考文献43

共引文献31

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部