期刊文献+

中美大学生心理适应水平比较 被引量:1

Comparative study on psychological adaption level between college students from China and the United States
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中美两国大学生在不同文化背景下的心理调适水平特征。方法选择美国德克萨斯州立大学356名学生和中国南京航空航天大学704名学生为研究对象,运用症状自评量表(SCL-90)对美国与中国大学生心理适应水平进行问卷调查,并与中国青年常模进行比较。结果美国大学生与中国青年常模相比较,躯体化(t=2.17,P<0.05)、强迫(t=5.49,P<0.01)、敌对(t=2.11,P<0.05)因子得分的差异有统计学意义;中国大学生与中国青年常模相比较,躯体化(t=8.41,P<0.01)、焦虑(t=8.41,P<0.01)、恐怖(t=6.42,P<0.01)、敌对(t=2.84,P<0.05)、精神病性因子得分(t=5.14,P<0.01)的差异有统计学意义;中美大学生比较:美国大学生在躯体化、焦虑、恐怖和精神病性得分均低于中国大学生,而强迫得分高于中国大学生,差异均有统计学意义。结论美国大学生心理调适水平较高,略优于中国大学生,这主要源于中美两国社会环境、历史文化背景以及教育体制的差异。 [Objective]To explore the characteristics of psychological adaption level of college students from China and the United States under different cultural background. [Methods]356 students from the Texas State University of the United States and 704 students from the Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics of China were enrolled in this study. A questionnaire survey was performed to investigate the psychological adaption level of college students from China and the United States by the Symptom check list-90(SCL-90),and the results were compared with Chinese youth norm. [Results]There were statistically significant differences in scores of somatization(t=2.17,P〈0.05),obsessive-compulsive(t=5.49,P〈0.01) and hostility(t=2.11,P〈0.05)between the United States college students and Chinese youth norm.There were statistically significant differences in scores of somatization(t=8.41,P〈0.01),anxiety(t=8.41,P〈0.01),horror(t=6.42,P〈0.01),hostility(t=2.84,P〈0.05) and psychoticism(t=5.14,P〈0.01)between the Chinese college students and Chinese youth norm. The scores of somatization,anxiety,horror and psychoticism in the United States college students were lower than those in Chinese college students,while the scores of obsessive-compulsive in the United States college students were higher than those in Chinese college students,and the difference was statistically significant. [Conclusion]The psychological adaption level of the United States college students is slightly better than that of Chinese college students,which is mainly caused by the different social environment,cultural background and educational system of two countries.
作者 佟雅囡
出处 《职业与健康》 CAS 2015年第20期2838-2840,共3页 Occupation and Health
基金 2014年江苏省社科基金项目(项目编号:14SHD003)
关键词 中美大学生 心理适应水平 College students from China and the United States Psychological adaption level
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1陈树林,李凌江.SCL-90信度效度检验和常模的再比较[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2003,29(5):323-327. 被引量:410
  • 2Archer J Jr,Lamnin A. An investigation of personal and academic stressors on college, campuses [J]. J College Student Personnel, 1985,26(5 ) : 210-215.
  • 3Damush TM,Hays RD, DiMatteo MR. Stressful life events and health- related quality of life in college student [J]. J College Students Devel- opment, 1997,38(4) : 181-190.
  • 4Essan CA,Trommsdorff G. Coping with university-related problems A cross Cultural comparision[J ]. J Cross-Cultural Psychol, 1996,27(5): 315 -328.
  • 5Okazaki S. Sources of ethnic differences between Asian American and white American college students on measures of depression and social anxietv[Jl.J Abnorm Psychol,1997,106(4):52-60.
  • 6许小冬,张玉田,王颖,等.体育与非体育专业大学生心理健康水平的比较[J].四川体育科学,2001,6(2):26—29.
  • 7杨昭宁.大学生运动员与一般大学生的16PF比较[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1993,7(4):187-187. 被引量:16
  • 8季建林,夏镇夷,徐俊冕.不同专业大学生SCL-90评定结果分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,1990,4(3):123-125.
  • 9王欣.中美大学生心理健康状况的比较研究[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),2000,2(1):114-117. 被引量:5
  • 10张福珍,纪晓明.中美大学生心理健康教育之比较[J].江苏高教,2011(1):122-123. 被引量:22

二级参考文献15

共引文献451

同被引文献33

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部