期刊文献+

福建敖江流域水域生态系统健康评估 被引量:14

Evaluation of aquatic ecosystem health in Aojiang Basin,Fujian Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以敖江流域为研究区,通过采集底栖动物、鱼类等样品,结合监测数据分析流域水域生态系统健康状况,并采用指标体系评估方法对水域生态系统进行评估.结果表明:敖江流域水质总体良好,但山仔水库总氮、总磷浓度长期超标,水体存在富营养化和藻类水华暴发生态环境问题;底栖动物种类呈现支流多于干流、河流多于水库的规律;鱼类种类上、中、下游各科物种组成差异不显著,鱼类区系特点具有较明显的热带、亚热带区系特点;流域上游、中游水域生态健康良好,下游水域生态健康一般. According to the suvery on benthic animal and fish samples, and combining with monitoring data, we analyzed the health condition of aquatic ecosystem, and made evaluation with an index in Aojiang Basin. The results showed that the water qual- ity was generally good in Aojiang Basin, but total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentration of Shanzi Reservoir exceeded standard for a long term which led to ecological environment problems, such as eutrophication and algae outbreak. Species numbers of ben- thic animals presented in the tributaries were greater than that in the river, with smallest species number in reservoir. The fish com- position in the upstream, midstream and downstream was not of significant difference, exhibiting a tropical and subtropical floristic characteristics. The health condition of aquatic ecosystem in both upstream and midstream was good, while that in downstream was moderate.
出处 《湖泊科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期1079-1086,共8页 Journal of Lake Sciences
基金 福建省环保科技计划项目(2013R011)资助
关键词 敖江流域 山仔水库 水域生态系统 健康评估 Aojiang Basin Shanzi Reservoir aquatic ecosystems health evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1王文杰,张哲,王维,刘孝富,许超.流域生态健康评价框架及其评价方法体系研究(一)——框架和指标体系[J].环境工程技术学报,2012,2(4):271-277. 被引量:44
  • 2龙笛,张思聪,樊朝宇.流域生态系统健康评价研究[J].资源科学,2006,28(4):38-44. 被引量:35
  • 3Hong B, Limburg KE, Erichson JD et al. Connecting the ecological-economic dots in human-donfinated watersheds: mod- els to link socio-economic activities on the landscape to stream ecosystem health. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2009, 91 ( 2 ) : 78-87.
  • 4Ayensu. International ecosystem assessment. Science, 2000, 286 (5440) : 6851.
  • 5Volstad JH, Neerchal NK, Roth NE et al. Combining biological indicators of watershed condition from multiple sampling program's a case study from Maryland, USA. Ecological Indicators, 2003, 3( 1 ) : 213-251.
  • 6Beck MB. Vulnerability of water quality in intensively developing urban watersheds. Environment Modelling & Software, 2005, 20(4) : 381-400.
  • 7Schuhz MT. A critique of EPA's index of watershed indicators. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, 62 (4) : 429-442.
  • 8Wang X. Integrating water quality management and land-use planning in a watershed context. Journal of Environmental Management, 2001, 62(4): 25-36.
  • 9刘焱序,彭建,汪安,谢盼,韩忆楠.生态系统健康研究进展[J].生态学报,2015,35(18):5920-5930. 被引量:80
  • 10罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,邓红兵,张萍,吴钢.流域生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606-1614. 被引量:158

二级参考文献211

共引文献453

同被引文献201

引证文献14

二级引证文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部