中国革命的连续性与中国当代史的“革命史”意义

The Continuity and The Significance of “the Chinese Revolution” in Contemporary Chinese History

中国共产党革命的终点并非1949年。在1949年以前,中国共产党既是在野革命党,也是局部执政党(苏区和根据地);1949年以后,中国共产党由局部执政党转变为全国性执政党,但并未改变其革命党的特质。在中国共产党当时的意识中,根本不存在一个由"革命党向执政党转型"的问题。革命仍是共和国前三十年的主旋律。只有将共和国前三十年的历史置于"革命"的大语境和大情境下去观察和分析才能允当。中国共产党革命虽然具有阶段性,更有一以贯之的"不变"的东西。如果忽视中国共产党革命的整体性和连续性,"中国当代史"上的很多问题就可能无法理解。就中国共产党自身历史而言,1949年并不是一条鸿沟。

1949 is not the end of the Communist Revolution. Chinese Communist Party was mot only revolutionary party, but also ruling party （in the Soviet regions and bases） before 1949; Chinese Communist Party transformed from a local riding party to a national one after 1949, hut its characteristics did not change in this progress. There was no such questions like ＂transforming from a revolutionary party to a ruling party＂ in the point of view of CCP. Revolution was still the main theme in the first thirty years of PRC. Only putting the history of the first thirty years into the macroscopic context of ＂revolution＂ can it be observed and analyzed. The Communist Revolution had some character of constancy in spite of its periodical character. Many problems in ＂Chinese contemporary history＂ can not be understood if ignoring the integrity and continuity of Communist Revolution in China. In the history of CCP itself, 1949 is not a chasm.