期刊文献+

欧洲慈善监管模式及对我国的启示 被引量:4

The Regulation Modes of Charities in Europe and Their Significance for China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在我国慈善事业广受质疑的背景下,完善监管制度具有必要性和紧迫性。欧洲各国有着悠久的慈善历史,并在各自的发展过程中形成了独具特色的监管模式。通过重点考察以英、德法及瑞典为代表的欧洲国家的三种慈善监管模式,归纳总结欧洲慈善事业所具有的依法监管、类别化监管、宽进严管、行业自治、第三方评估及受益人与公权力的监管等慈善监管经验,以期为完善我国慈善监管制度提供参考借鉴。 It is necessary and urgent to improve the mechanism of supervision over charity organizations in China due to the widespread distrust in China's charities. European countries have a long history of philanthropy, and have established their respective regulatory modes. The paper discusses the three major regulatory modes of charities in Britain, Germany and France, and Sweden. It maintains that European countries have much experience to offer, including, 'regulation according to the law, multiple regulation, harsh punishment tempered with leniency, and classified regulation'. This experience can be of much value for China in its effort to improve its charity regulation mode.
作者 谢琼
出处 《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期39-45,191,共7页 Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基金 2013年河南省高校科技创新人才支持计划(人文社科类)"欧盟债务危机对福利制度建设的启示"的阶段性研究成果
关键词 慈善 监管模式 慈善立法 欧洲 charities regulatory mode charity law Europe
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1王名.英国慈善委员会的特色监管[N].人民政协报,2005-07-12.
  • 2Anne Marie Piper, aSara van der Pas. England & Wales. In: Anne-Marie Piper. Charity Law[M]. Thomson Reuters, 2012.
  • 3谢琼.国外慈善立法的规律、特点及启示[J].教学与研究,2014(12):23-31. 被引量:8
  • 4Anderas Richter, Anna Katharina. Germany. In: Anne-Marie Piper, Charity Law [M]. Thomson Reuters, 2012.
  • 5辛华.德国:独立机构和“捐助徽章”[N].经济参考报,2011-12-06.
  • 6Mannheimer Swartling, Michael Karlsson. Sweden. In: Anne-Marie Piper. Charity Law[M]. Thomson Reuters, 2012.
  • 7埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆.公共事务的治理之遭:集体行动制度的演进[M].上海:上海译文出版社,2012.
  • 8Yetman M H, Yetman R J. The Effects of Governance on the Financial Reporting Quality of Nonprofit Organizations[ R ]. Working Paper of the University of California at Davis, 2006.
  • 9Pablo A A, Natalia M C, Elena M R. The Governance of Nonprofit Organizations: Empirical Evidence From Nongovernmental Development Organizations in Spain[ J ]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2011, ( 40 ).

二级参考文献5

  • 1张奇林.美国的慈善立法及其启示[J].法学评论,2007,25(4):99-106. 被引量:53
  • 2James Douglas. Political Theories of NonprofitOrganization [A], in Walter W. Powell ed.The Nonprofit Sector [C]. New Haven: YaleUniversity Press, 1987.
  • 3Anne Marie Piper, Sara Van der Pas. Eng-land & Wales, in Anne-Marie Piper, CharityLaw[Z]. Thomson Reuters,2012.
  • 4Mannheimer Swartling, Michael Karlssoa Swe-den, in Anne-Marie Piper, Charity Law [Z].Thomson Reuters, 2012.
  • 5Andreas Richter, Anna Katharina Gollan,Ger-many, in Anne-Marie Piper, Charity Law[Z].Thomson Reuters, 2012.

共引文献8

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部