研发投入跳跃对企业绩效影响的实证研究——双元性创新注意力的中介作用被引量：27

R&D investment leap and firm performance:The mediating role of ambidextrous innovative attention

导出

摘要研发是企业获取竞争优势的重要途径。企业绩效不仅受研发投入强度的影响,还受研发投入波动的影响。基于企业的注意力基础观,运用2007-2013年中国202家上市公司的面板数据,结合事件研究法和文本分析法,分析研发投入跳跃对企业绩效的影响及其机制。研究表明,研发投入跳跃越大,则企业绩效越高;决策者双元性创新注意力在研发投入跳跃与企业绩效之间起中介作用。 Research and development（ RD） is an important way for firm to obtain competitive advantage. Prior research showed that firm performance was not only affected by RD investment intensity,also affected by RD investment volatility. Based on the attention- based view of firm,using panel data of 202 listed firms in China from 2007 to 2013,combining event study method and the text analysis method,we empirically investigate the effect and its mechanism of RD investment leap on firm performance. Results show that RD investment leap positively influences firm performance,and the ambidextrous innovative attention is the mediation in the relationship between RD investment leap and firm performance.

作者吴建祖肖书锋

机构地区兰州大学管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第10期1538-1546,1554,共10页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71472078 71072068)

关键词研发投入跳跃双元性创新注意力企业绩效中介作用 R＆D investment leap ambidextrous innovative attention firm performance mediating effect

分类号 F270 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献41

1Hall B H,Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M. Market value and pa- tent citations[J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2005, 36(1) :16 -18.
2Jaffe A B. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms" patents, profits and market value[J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5) : 984 - 1001.
3Falk M. Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D inten- sity on firm performance [ J ]. Small Business Econom- ics, 2012, 39(1) : 19 -37.
4Sharma C. R&D and firm performance: Evidence from the indian pharmaceutical industry [ J ]. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 2012, 17(2) : 332 -342.
5郭斌.规模、R&D与绩效:对我国软件产业的实证分析[J].科研管理,2006,27(1):121-126. 被引量：102
6戴小勇,成力为.研发投入强度对企业绩效影响的门槛效应研究[J].科学学研究,2013,31(11):1708-1716. 被引量：177
7Lin B -W,Lee Y, Hung S-C. R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial per- formance[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59 (6) : 679 -685.
8Kor Y Y, Mahoney J T. How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm level performance [ J ]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 2005, 26 (5) : 489 - 496.
9Mudambi R, Swift T. Knowing when to leap: Transitio- ning between exploitative and explorative R&D [ J ]. strategic Management Journal, 2014, 35 ( 1 ) : 126 - 145.
10Bushee B J. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior [ J]. Accounting Re- view, 1998,73(3) :305 -333.

二级参考文献111

1Dehua Ju. China's budding software industry [J]. IEEE Software, May - June 2001 : 92 -95.
2Howard Rubin, Margaret Johnson, and Susan Iventosch. The US software industry [ J ]. IEEE Software, Jan. -Feb.2002 : 95 - 97.
3J. Robins and M. F. Wiersema. A resource- based approach to the multibusiness firm: empirical analysis of the portfolio interrelationships and corporate financial performance [ J 1.Strategic Management Journal, 1995, 16:277-299.
4Ashish Arora, V. S. Arunachalam, Jai Asundi, and Ronald Fernandes. The Indian software services industry [ J ]. Research Policy, 2001, 30: 1267-1287.
5Deependra Moitra. Indiag software industry [ J]. IEEE Software, Jan. - Feb. 2001 : 77 - 80.
6P. D. Chatzoglou and N. Vafeas. The financial profile of the software industry between 1980 and 1994 [ Jl. Information and Software Technology, 2000, 42:755 -763.
7R. Hoskisson, R. A. Johnson, and D. D. Moesel. Corporate divesture intensity in restructuring firms: effects of governance, strategy, and performance [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37:1207-1251.
8R. Schmalensee. Inter - industry studies of structure and performance. In R. Schmalensee and R. Willig ( Eds. ),Handbook of industrial organization: vol. 2, 1989, (pp.951 - 1011). Amsterdam: North Holland.
9Subroto Bagehi. India's software industry: the people dimension [J].IEEE Software, May-June 1999:62 -65.
10Romer P M. Endogenous technological change [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5) : 71 -101.