摘要
为解决我国各地方多民族的法律需求,刑法授权省及自治区人大变通的权力,此项规定至今未被适用。本文在坚持刑法变通权是基于刑法的特别授权而产生,并且符合宪法规定的理论基础上;从罪刑法定原则、民族自治地方的现状、与国外相比较等方面论述刑法变通权所面临的困境及问题,认为刑法九十条只具有兜底性的作用,而现今应该大力发展刑法变通司法路径机制,破除相关的体制束缚,才能更切合实际地解决少数民族地区刑事问题,维护国家的稳定与繁荣。
In order to solve the legal needs of Chinese minorities, the Provincial People's Congress and the Autonomous Region People's Congress have been authorized the power to modify the law, but this provision has not been used. This paper insists on the right to modify the penal code and special authorization based on the criminal law in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution on the theoretical basis; from the principle of legality,ethnic autonomous areas, comparison with foreign practices do come the difficulties and problems in modifying the penal code, and the 90 th article of the criminal law only plays a fallback role. In present society, we should develop the accommodation of criminal law judicial path mechanism, get rid of the shackles of system, so that we can be more practical to solve criminal problems in ethnic minority areas and maintain the stability and prosperity of the country.
出处
《边疆经济与文化》
2015年第10期17-21,共5页
The Border Economy and Culture
关键词
刑法变通
罪刑法定
兜底条款
司法路径
Accommodation of criminal law
Legality
Miscellaneous Provisions
Judicial Path