期刊文献+

不同社区管理模式对高血压患者并发心脑血管疾病的影响 被引量:6

Impact of community-based different hypertension management models on the incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular disease in hypertensive patients
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价不同社区管理模式对高血压患者并发心脑血管疾病的影响。方法 2008年8月—2012年12月在浦东新区部分社区开展高血压不同管理模式的对照研究,招募符合纳入标准的1 578名高血压患者作为研究对象并随机分为管理组和对照组。对照组采用常规高血压管理方法,管理组采用细节管理,由健康专员及社区医师负责随访以及相关资料收集。结果管理组的心脑血管发病率(1.33%)小于对照组(4.22%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析显示,男性、年龄升高、高血压病程增长、有高血压家族史、血肌酐升高、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高均为心脑血管事件的危险因素(P均<0.05),而管理组发生心脑血管事件的风险是对照组的0.348倍(P<0.05)。结论高血压细节管理相对于常规管理有优势,能有效减少心脑血管事件。 Objective To evaluate different hypertension management models in communities and their impact on incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular disease in hypertensive patients. Methods A total of 1 578 hypertension patients in several communities in Pudong New Area were recruited in the study ( August 2008 to December 2012 ) according to the inclusion criteria and randomly divided into two groups.The control group was given routine hypertension management and the study group was given detailed hypertension management, while health commissioners and community physicians were in charge of the follow-up and data collection. Results The incidence of cardio-cerebrovascular disease (1.33%) in study group (1.33%) was significantly lower than that of the control group (4.22%) ( P 〈0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, male, course-of-disease, patients with hypertension family history, increase in SCr and LDL-C increased the risk for getting ardio-cerebrovascular disease (P 〈0.05).The risk of study group was 0.348 times the control group ( P 〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with control group, detailed hypertension management model conducted in study group has the advantages that effectively reduced the rate of cardio-cerebrovascular disease.
出处 《上海预防医学》 CAS 2015年第10期605-608,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 浦东新区卫生系统学科带头人培养计划资助项目(PWRd2010-3)
关键词 高血压 社区管理模式 心脑血管疾病 Hypertension Community based management model Cardio-cerebrovascular disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献47

  • 1Sakoda M,Ichihara A,Kurauchi-Mito A,Narita T,Kinou-chi K,Murohashi-Bokuda K,Saleem MA,Nishiyama A,Suzuki F,Itoh H,黄晓斌.在不影响人足细胞(前)肾素受体信号下,阿利吉仑能抑制细胞内血管紧张素Ⅱ水平[J].中华高血压杂志,2010,18(7):698-698. 被引量:18
  • 2认真评估心血管病危险性,全面多因素干预[J].高血压杂志,2005,13(10):595-596. 被引量:3
  • 3Lorig KR,Mazonson PD,Holman HR.Evidence suggesting that health Education for self-management in patient with chronic arthritis has sustained Health benefits which reducing health care costs[J].Arthritis and Rheumatism,1 993,36:439-446.
  • 4Fu Dongbo,FuHua,Patrick McGowan,eta1.Implementation and quantitative evaluation of chronic Disease Self management programme in Shanghai,China:randomized controlled trial[J].Bulletin of the world Health Organization,2003,81(3):174-182.
  • 5Lorig K,Stewart A,Ritter P,et a1.Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions.Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications Inc,1996.
  • 6王肖龙.2005中国高血压防治指南.高血压规范管理与健康教育技能培训授课教材[M].上海市健康教育协会医院专业委员会,2006.
  • 7胡盛寿,孔灵芝.中国心血管病报告2006[M].北京:中国大百科全书出版社.2008:12.
  • 8陈撅珠.实用内科学,第12版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,2665-2666.
  • 9马冠生,孔灵芝,主编.中国居民营养与健康状况调查报告之九.2002行为和生活方式.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,75.
  • 10Iso H,Date C,Yamamoto A,et al.Smoking cessation and mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese men and women:the JACC study.Am J Epidemiol.2005,161:170-179.

共引文献280

同被引文献51

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部