期刊文献+

不同时程的氟西汀与艾司西酞普兰应用对大鼠抑郁样行为及海马齿状回神经发生的影响 被引量:4

Effects of Different Duration of Fluoxetine and Escitalopram Use on Depressivelike Behavior and Neurogenesis of Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus in Adult Rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察氟西汀及艾司西酞普兰不同的使用时程对大鼠抑郁样行为及海马齿状回神经发生的影响。方法:96只SD大鼠采用随机数字表法随机分为12组:M1组到M12组。各组造模后分别腹腔注射不同时程的生理盐水(M2、M6、M10组)、氟西汀(M3、M7、M11组)及艾司西酞普兰(M4、M8、M12组)。1周后,M1、M2、M3、M4组行矿场实验及糖水偏好实验,荧光免疫双标方法检测海马齿状回BrdU阳性细胞及Nestin阳性细胞的表达。2周后,M5、M6、M7、M8组行相同操作。3周后,M9、M10、M11、M12组行相同操作。结果:在矿场实验中,M1组与M3组,M6组与M8组,M10组与M11组、M10组与M12组间10min总行程差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在糖水偏好实验中,M2组与M4组,M6组与M8组,M10组与M11组、M10组与M12组间糖水偏好率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。M1组与M3组,M2组与M4组,M5组与M7组,M5组与M8组,M9组与M12组、M10组与M11组间BrdU/Nestin双标阳性细胞百分比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:氟西汀与艾司西酞普兰使用3周后均能改善大鼠抑郁样行为。艾司西酞普兰在治疗抑郁症方面起效时间更快,可能的原因之一便是对海马区神经再生的影响更快速,继而通过对相关通路的作用,改善抑郁行为。 Objective:To investigate the effects of different duration of fluoxetine and escitalopram use on depressive-like behavior and neurogenesis of hippocampal dentate gyrus in adult rats.Methods:Ninety-six SD rats were randomly divided into twelve groups:from M1 group to M12 group.After subjected to CUMS,every group was injected with saline(M2group,M6 group and M10group),or fluoxetine(M3group,M7 group and M11group),or escitalopram(M4group,M8 group and M12group)for different duration respectively.After one week of intervention,the open-field test and 1% sucrose preference test were performed to observe the rats' depression-like behaviors for M1 group,M2group,M3 group and M4 group.After behavior test,theBrdU and Nestin positive cells of dentate gyrus in rats were detected by double-labeling immunofluorescence method.After two weeks of intervention,M5 group,M6group,M7 group and M8 group underwent the same operation.After three weeks of intervention,M9 group,M10group,M11 group and M12 group underwent the same operation.Results:In the open-field test,the difference of 10 minutes total moved distances were statistically significant(P〈0.05)between these groups:M1group vs M3 group,M6group vs M8 group,M10group vs M11 group,M10group vs M12 group.In the 1% sucrose preference test,the sucrose preference consumption differences were statistically significant(P〈 0.05)between these groups:M2group vs M4 group,M6group vs M8 group,M10group vs M11 group,M10group vs M12 group.There were significant differences(P〈0.05)in BrdU/Nestin positive cells percent between these groups:M1group vs M3 group,M2group vs M4 group,M5group vs M7 group,M5group vs M8 group,M9group vs M12 group,M10group vs M11 group.Conclusion:Three weeks of fluoxetine and escitalopram use can improve depression-like behavior in rats.Compared with fluoxetine,escitalopram reveales shorter onset time in the treatment of depression.One of the possible reasons is that it advances hippocampal neurogenesis quickly,then improves depressive behavior by the action of the relevant pathways.
出处 《武汉大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2015年第6期862-866,共5页 Medical Journal of Wuhan University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(编号:81201058)
关键词 氟西汀 艾司西酞普兰 抑郁 齿状回 神经发生 Fluoxetine Escitalopram Depression Dentate Gyrus Neurogenesis
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Ferrari AJ, Charlson FJ, Norman RE, et al. The epi- demiological modelling of major depressive disorder~ application for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 [J]. PLoSOne, 2013, 8(7):e69637.
  • 2Harvey AW, Louisa D, Jurgen R, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use dis-orders: finndings from the Global Burden of Disease Study2010[J]. Lancet,2013,382: 1 575-1 586.
  • 3Videbech P, Ravnkilde B. Hippocampal volume and depression., a meta-analysis of MRI studies[J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2004,161:1 957-1 966.
  • 4Manji HK, Drevets WC, Charney DS. The cellular neurobiology of depression[J]. Nat Med, 2001, 7 : 541- 547.
  • 5曾思琳,杨焱,黄敏,郭毅.SSRI类药物与神经发生的相关研究进展[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2014,9(4):337-341. 被引量:3
  • 6肖勃,谢文娇,谢思斯,黄燕萍,丘春柳,李桂臣,李庆伟,洪晓虹,崔立谦.艾司西酞普兰和氟西汀治疗首发抑郁症临床疗效及认知功能影响的比较[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2009,18(6):487-489. 被引量:36
  • 7Sharma HR, Thakur MK. Correlation of ERa/ER~ expression with dendritic and behavioural changes in CUMS mice[J]. Physiol Bahav, 2015,145 : 71-83.
  • 8Reed AL, Anderson ]C, gylund DB, et aL Teatment with escitalopram but not desipramine decreases escape latency times in a learned helplessness model using ju- venile rats E J2- Psychopharmacology (Berl), 2009, 205: 249-259.
  • 9Brunello N, Alboni S, Capone G, et al. Acetylsalieylic acid accelerates the antidepressant effect of fluoxetine in the chronic escape deficit model of depressionI-J3. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 2006, 21: 219-225.
  • 10肖玲,舒畅,唐记华,王晓萍,王高华.不同时程的慢性应激对大鼠抑郁行为和海马神经再生的影响[J].中华实验外科杂志,2013,30(9):1844-1847. 被引量:2

二级参考文献52

  • 1Magarlnos AM, Somoza G, De Nicola AF. Glucocorticoid negative feedback and glueoeortieoid receptors after hippocampeetomy in rats. Horm Metab Res, 1987,19 : 105-109.
  • 2Deacon RM, Bannerman DM, Rawlins JN. Anxiolytic effects of cyto- toxic hippocampal lesions in rats. Behav Neurosci, 2002,116:494- 497.
  • 3Bannerman DM, Deacon RMJ, Often S, et al. Double dissociation of function within the hippocampus:spatial memory and hyponeophagia. Behav Neurosei ,2003,116:884-901.
  • 4Benmnghof ,J,Schmitt A, Mossner R, et At. When cells become de- pressed : focus on neural stem eels in novel treatment strategies against depression. J Neural Transm,2002,109:947.
  • 5Riccio A, Ahn S, Davenport CM, et al. Mediation by a CREB family transcription factor of NGF-dependent survival of sympathetic neu- rons. Science, 1999,286:2358-2361.
  • 6Gould E, Gross CG. Neurogenesis in adult mammals:some progress and problems. J Neurosci,2002 ,22 :619-623.
  • 7Perera TD, Coplan JD, Lisanby SH, et al. Antidepressant-induced neu- rogenesis in the hippocampus of adult nonhuman primates. J Neuros- ci ,2007,27:4894-4901.
  • 8Perera TD, Dwork AJ, Keegan KA, et al. Necessity of hippocampal neurogenesis for the therapeutic action of antidepressants in adult non- human primates. PloS one, 2011,6 : e17600.
  • 9Malberg JE,Eisch AJ,Nestler EJ,et al.Chronic Antidepressant Treatment Increases Neurogenesis in Adult Rat Hippocampus[J].J Neurosci,2000,20:9104-9110.
  • 10Santarelli L,Saxe M,Gross C,et al.Requirement ofhippocampal neurogenesis for the behavioral effects of antidepressants[J].Science,2003,301:805-809.

共引文献38

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部