期刊文献+

椎旁神经根阻滞治疗腰椎管狭窄症的疗效

Efficacy of paravertebral nerve root block in the treatment of patients with lumber spinal stenosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨神经根阻滞疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄症的安全性及临床效果。方法选择轻至中度症状的腰椎管狭窄症患者80例,随机分为两组,每组40例。其中口服药物组给予双氯芬酸钠缓释胶囊,50mg/次,口服,2次,d,服用2周;甲钴胺片,0.5mg口服,3次,d,服用1个月;阻滞组每周椎旁神经根阻滞治疗1次,3次为1个疗程。治疗前及治疗后4个月时随访,随访时行VAS评分及行走改善情况记录比较。结果两组患者治疗前VAS评分及步行距离差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);与治疗前比较,两组患者治疗后VAS评分及步行距离均得到改善,且阻滞组改善更明显,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。两组患者均未见严重不良反应。结论椎旁神经根阻滞疗法治疗腰椎管狭窄症安全有效。 Objective To explore the safety and efficacy of the nerve root block therapy in the treatment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods Eighty patients with mild to moderate symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis were randomly divided into two groups, 40 cases in each group. Patients in oral medication group were given diclofenac sodium sustained-release capsules, 50 rag/time, 2 times/day, 2 weeks; mecobalamin tablets, 0.5 mg/time, 3 times/day, one month; Block group were given weekly paravertebral nerve root block, 3 times for one course of treatment. Before and 4 months after the treatment, the VAS and self-paced walking test were recorded and compared. Results The VAS and walking distance had no statistical difference in the two groups before treatment (P 〉 0.05); Compared with pretreatment, the VAS and walking distance in the two groups were all improved after treatment, the patients in block group were more improved, which were of statistical significance (P〈 0.05). The serious adverse reactions were not seen in all patients. Conclusion Paravertebral nerve roots block is safe and effective in the treatment of patients with lumber spinal stenosis.
出处 《实用疼痛学杂志》 2015年第3期177-180,共4页 Pain Clinic Journal
关键词 椎管狭窄 脊神经根 神经传导阻滞 腰椎 Spinal stenosis Spinal nerve root Nerve block Lumbar vertebrae
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1徐宾,蒋玉红,范希文,姜先敏,王千,张晋绥.SPR治疗脑瘫手术前后上肢微循环变化的观测[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(19):1468-1470. 被引量:3
  • 2赵军,董国祥,栾景源.化学性胸交感神经节切除术治疗雷诺综合征[J].中华医学杂志,2003,83(22):1943-1945. 被引量:8
  • 3张金山,肖越勇.椎间盘突出的微创治疗[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2005,2(4):242-244. 被引量:30
  • 4谭建强,郑宝森.腰椎旁注射治疗腰椎间盘突出症124例临床总结[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2006,2(4):214-215. 被引量:10
  • 5van Boxem K, van Bilsen J, de Meij N, et al. Pulsed radiofre- quency treatment adjacent to the lumbar dorsal root ganglion for the management of lumbosacral radicular syndrome a clin- ical audit. Pain Med, 2011, 12(9)1322-1330.
  • 6Rehman SU, Khan MZ, Hussain R, et al. Pulsed radiofre- quency modulation for lingual neuralgia. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2012, 50(1).e4-5.
  • 7Chua NH, Beems T, Visser KC. Two cases of glossopharyn- geal neuralgia successfully treated with pulsed radiofrequency treatment. Ann Aead Med Singapore, 2011, 40(8):387-389.
  • 8Choi HJ, Choi SK, Kim TS, et al. Pulsed radiofrequency neu- romodulation treatment on the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve for the treatment of meralgia paresthetica. J Korean Neuro- surg Soc, 2011, 50(2)151-153.
  • 9Nguyen M, Wilkes D. Pulsed radiofrequeny V2 treatment and intranasal sphenopalatine ganglion block: a combination thera- py for atypical trigeminal neuralgia. Pain Pract, 2010, 10(4) 370-374.
  • 10Ahadian FM. Pulsed radiofrequency neurotomy: advances in pain medicine. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2004, 8(1) :34-40.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部