期刊文献+

中资银行国际化的价值效应:源于市场机会还是监管套利?——来自中国资本市场的证据 被引量:9

The Value Effects of Commercial Banks Internationalization:from Market Forces or Regulation Arbitrage?Evidence from Capital Market in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 关于银行跨国经营的价值效应来源,现有理论存在着"市场机会"与"监管套利"两种解释。本文运用事件研究法,以中资银行2006年以来的全部国际化事件为样本考察了国际化的价值效应。结果显示,中国资本市场对监管套利机会做出显著正向反应,但并未对市场机会做出反应。研究结论在考虑目标市场债权人保护水平的影响后依然成立。本文提供的监管套利的价值效应证据既为未来的中国金融机构实施"走出去"战略的目标选择提供了参考,也有助于更好地理解金融机构国际化的动因。 Market forces and regulation arbitrage are two explanations for the value effects of bank international- ization in global financial markets. We use event study method to examine these two explanations respectively, based on all bank internationalization events since 2006. The result shows Chinese capital market gives high abnormal returns for capital arbitrage opportunity, but doesn't respond to market forces. The finding remains robust when considering the value effect of creditor protection in target country. This research indicates that how banks choose their target area matters and also helps to understand the motivation of why financial institutions choose internationalization.
出处 《金融研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第9期96-111,共16页 Journal of Financial Research
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(项目号:71472180) 北京市社会科学基金项目(13JGC084)资助
关键词 中资银行 国际化 监管套利 Chinese commercial banks, Internationalization, Regulation arbitrage
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

二级参考文献126

  • 1李扬,王荣艳(整理).中国金融业发展的中长期问题[J].国际经济评论,2007(1):39-40. 被引量:4
  • 2Acharya, V. , 2003, “Is the International Convergence of Capital Adequacy RegulationDesirable?”, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 58:2745 -2781.
  • 3Alexander ,K. , 2003, “The Need for Efficient International Financial Regulation and the Role of a Global Supervisor”, Journal of Money Launder Control, Vol. 5 No. 1:52 -65.
  • 4Ariccia,G. D. , and B. ,Marquez,2001, “Competition among Regulators”, Working Paper, IMF.
  • 5Barro, R. J. , and D. B. , Gordon, 1983 , “Rules, Discretion and Reputation in a Model of Monetary Policy”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 12:613 -682.
  • 6Benston, G. J. , 1992. “International Regulatory Coordination of Banking.” In John Figleton, eds. ,The Internationalization of Capital Markets and Regulatory Response. London: Granam&Trotman, pp. 197 -210.
  • 7Breeden, R. C. ,1992,“Reconciling National and International Concerns in the Regulation of Global Capital Markets.” In John Figleton, eds., The Internationalization of Capital Markets and Regulatory Response. London: Granam&Trotman. pp. 27 - 32.
  • 8Feltenstein, A. , and R. , Lagunoff, 2003, “International Versus Domestic Auditing of Bank Solyency”, working paper, IMF.
  • 9Fourcans, A. , and T. , Warin, 2001, “Tax Harmonization versus Tax Competition in Europe: A Game Theoretical Approach”, Working Paper No. 132 , Center for Research on Economic Fluctuations and Employment.
  • 10Gatsios, K. , and P. , Holmes, 1997, “Regulatory Competition and International Harmonization”, Working Paper No. 36, CEI.

共引文献274

同被引文献232

引证文献9

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部