期刊文献+

博弈方的行动集合变化的博弈运动研究——以稀土出口贸易为例

Research on the Gaming of the Players' Action Sets Changing:A Case Study of the Rare Earth Trade
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以稀土出口贸易为背景,分析了博弈方的行动集合随时间变化的博弈运动。首先定义了行动集合的三种变化情形:集合变大、集合变小和集合变化不确定。然后针对单个博弈方行动集合的三种变化情形,分别讨论了均衡解的运动轨迹,分析表明:在行动集合变大和变小两种情形下,均衡解的轨迹呈现互逆的运动特性;在行动集合变化不确定的情形下,保守和冒险策略等价,固定策略严格优于保守、冒险策略。在此基础上,将模型推广到博弈双方的行动集合均发生变化的博弈运动模型,分析表明上述结论仍然成立。最后,以中国同马来西亚在2012年6月到2013年3月间的稀土出口贸易为例,验证了本文模型和求解方法的合理性与可行性。 Considering the export of rare earth as background, this paper analyzes the gaming model in which the players' action sets are changing over time. First, we define three changing styles for action set: action set heightening, action set shrinking, and action set changing indeterminacy. Then we investigate the track of the equilibrium solution in which only one player' s action set will change over time. The results show that the tracks of the equilibrium solution when the action set heightening and shrinking are opposite, and the stationary strategy is strictly superior to conservative strategy and risky strategy which are equivalent in this situation. Moreover, this single action set changing model is applied to both two action sets changing overtime and the results still hold trne for the new model. Finally, the rationality and feasibility of the gaming model and solution are validated by a case study of the rare earth export of China and Malaysia from June 2012 to March 2013.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期57-65,共9页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371129 61221063) 长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT1173)
关键词 稀土贸易 寡头竞争 行动集合 博弈运动 运动轨迹 rare earth trade oligopoly competition action sets gaming motion trial
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Schwalbe U,Walker P.Zermelo and the early history of game theory[J].Games and Economic Behavior,2001,34(09):123-137.
  • 2Neumann J V,Zur theorie der gesellschaftsspiele[J].Mathematische Annalen,1928,100(1);295-320.
  • 3Von Neumann J,Morgenstern O.Theory of games and economic behavior(commemorative edition)[M].Princeton university press,2007.
  • 4Nash J.Non-cooperative games[J].The Annals of Mathematics,1951,54(2):286-295.
  • 5Smith J M,Price G R.The logic of animal conflict[J].Nature,1973,246:15.
  • 6Tse P K.China's rare-earth industry[M].US Department of the Interior,US Geological Survey,2011.
  • 7王正明,张许静.稀土资源税对“寡头”国出口市场势力的影响研究[J].经济经纬,2012,29(2):52-55. 被引量:17
  • 8裴文琳,孔锐.我国稀土进出口量与价格关联度状况分析[J].资源开发与市场,2011,27(7):613-616. 被引量:8
  • 9Elsadany A A.Competition analysis of a triopoly game with bounded rationality[J].Chaos,Solitons & Fractals,2012,45(11):1343-1348.
  • 10Elsadany A A,Agiza H N,Elabbasy E M.Complex dynamics and chaos control of heterogeneous quadropoly game[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation,2013,219(24):11110-11118.

二级参考文献52

共引文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部