期刊文献+

多种风险下研发项目投资决策博弈分析 被引量:10

R&D Project Investment Decision Game Analysis Under A Variety of Risks
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研发项目代表了高新技术企业的核心竞争力,但是其投资和研发的过程所包含的多种风险可能会造成企业经济上的损失。为了保证竞争优势和收益最大化,企业投资前需要对项目的估值非常的精确,以便在竞争中做出最优投资决策。本文以市场中的两个竞争性企业为例,利用欧式复合期权理论与博弈论,量化了技术风险、商业风险和突发风险等不确定性,在经过了信息披露过程之后,分析了市场中企业自身和竞争者的投资决策,建立相应的研发项目投资决策数学模型,对企业的研发项目投资时机和决策收益进行评估,通过博弈得到纳什均衡下的企业最优投资决策。 R&D projects represent the core competitiveness of the high-tech enterprises, and there are a variety of risks in investment and research process. In order to keep competitive advantages and maximize the benefits, it needs to be very accurate in valuation of the projects for the optimal investment decisions in the competition before investment. By utilizing the European option value and game theory, quantified technical risk, economic risk and sudden risks, and combined with the jump-diffusion process and i.nformation revelation process, after analyzing investment decisions of enterprises themselves and competitors in the market, this paper establishes the corresponding R&D projects investment decision payoff mathematics model which can assess the timing and payoffs of the investment for two enterprises and obtain the optimal investment decisions after Nash equilibrium.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期66-74,共9页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70871030)
关键词 投资决策收益 最优决策 实物期权 博弈 研发项目 风险 investment decision-making payoffs optimal investment decisions real options game R&Dprojects risks
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Margrabe W.The value of an option to exchange one asset for another[J].Journal of Finance,1978,33(1):177-186.
  • 2McDonald R L,Siegel D R.Investiment and the valuation of firms when there is an option to shut down[J].International Eco- nomic Review,1985,28(2):331-349.
  • 3Armada M R,Kryzanowsky L,Pereira P J.A modified finite-lived American exchange option methodology applied to real options valuation[J].Global Finance Journal,2007,17(3):419-438.
  • 4Paxson D A.Sequential American exchange property options[J].The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,2007,34(1):135-157.
  • 5Carr P.The valuation of sequential exchange opportunities[J].The Journal of Finance,1988,43(5):1235-1256.
  • 6Pennings E,Sereno L.Evaluating pharmaceutical R&D under technical and economic uncertainty[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2011,212(2):374-385.
  • 7Ghosh S,Troutt M D.Complex compound option models-Can practitioners truly operationalize them?[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2012,222(3):542-552.
  • 8Thijssen J J J,Huisman K J M,Kort P M.Symmetric equilibrium strategies in game theoretic real option models[J].Journal of Mathematical Economics,2012,48(4):219-225.
  • 9Martzoukos S H,Zacharias E.Real option games with R&D and learning spillovers[J].Omega,2013,41(2):236-249.
  • 10Koussis N,Martzoukos S H,Trigeorgis L.Multi-stage product development with exploration,value-enhancing,preemptive and innovation options[J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2013,37(1):174-190.

二级参考文献144

共引文献85

同被引文献44

引证文献10

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部