摘要
自从赵元任提出"关内式"的功能为描写、"关外式"的功能为限制以来,先后得到吕叔湘、陆丙甫的支持。唐正大否定了这一联系,认为关系从句的位置取决于关系化的对象。唐文否定的只是两个范畴之间最一般的关联方式,即一一对应,继而从标记模式的角度论证了"关外式"与限制、"关内式"与描写之间的无标记关联,从认知和信息加工策略的高度对该模式提供了更高层次的支持和解释。
Since Chao proposed that the "relative- internal structure"corresponds with depiction and the "relative- external structure"relates to limitation,it has been echoed by Lv Shuxiang and Lu Binfu. This correlation is denied by Tang Zhengda,which,based on statistics,maintains that the position of relative clause depends on the object of relativization. While pointing out that what Tang denies is merely the commonest way of correlation between the position of relative clause and its pragmatic function,it backs up Zhao by proposing and demonstrating a markedness pattern between the two categories. More evidences of cognitive science and psychological studies are provided at the end.
出处
《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2015年第4期101-104,共4页
Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
关内式
关外式
限制
描写
关联标记模式
relative-internal structure
relative-external structure
limitation
depiction
markedness pattern