期刊文献+

主体功能区建设中财政支出的资源环境偏向研究 被引量:4

Study of Fiscal Expenditure about Resources Environment Bias in the Process of Constructing Main Functional Areas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建政府异质性偏好的理论模型,选取广东省为样本进行研究,测算不同主体功能定位下政府财政支出偏向,结果发现:优化开发区域公共财政支出偏向于经济建设领域,重点开发区域公共财政支出侧重于资源节约型、环境友好型的低碳发展模式,限制开发区域和禁止开发区域公共财政支出则以资源环境保护为重点,这是由于:对国土资源空间划分不同类型的功能区域,决定不同功能区域所承担的职能也不尽相同,政府在公共财政资金支出偏好选择上相应有所侧重,因而也造成各功能区财政支出偏向的不同。应该指出的是,各类主体功能区政府要在"经济建设偏好"和"资源环境偏好"之间寻找平衡点,通过优化公共财政支出结构,提升公共财政资源配置效率,实现国家的主体功能区战略。 This paper establishes the theoretical model of government preference heterogeneity, analyzes the fiscal expenditure structure orientation of main functional areas. The conclusion is : the fiscal expenditure structure of optimize development areas focus on economic and social development, the key development areas focus on the field of energy development, and the restricted development areas focus on resource and environmental protection. The reason is that according to different kinds of functional district by dividing of national land and resources, the economic and social functions of functional district is different, and government preferences of selecting public finance expenditures should be focused on different field. It should be noted that, different functional district governments must make balance between 'economic development preference' and 'energy protection preferences' , optimize the fiscal expenditure structure, and achieve effective supply of different types of oublic goods.
作者 陈旭佳
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期143-151,共9页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家社科基金青年项目"效果均等标准下基本公共文化服务均等化制度设计研究"(编号:14CJY061)
关键词 主体功能区 财政支出 资源环境偏向 异质性偏好 main functional areas local fiscal expenditure resources environment bias heterogeneity preference
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献187

共引文献2570

同被引文献60

  • 1财政部财政科学研究所课题组,白景明,孟翠莲,李成威,鄢晓发.财税体制对地方政府固定资产投资膨胀的影响分析[J].经济研究参考,2007(72):2-28. 被引量:6
  • 2BRAID M.2013.State and local tax competition in a spatial model with sales taxes and residential property taxes[J].Journal of Urban Economics,75:57-67.
  • 3BAHL R,MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ J.2008.The property tax in developing countries:current practice and prospects[M]∥CORNIA G,RIDDELL J.Toward a Vision of Land in 2015.International Perspectives,Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • 4EDWARD B,DAVID L,SALLY W.2008.Incidence and economic impacts of property taxes in developing and transitional countries[M]∥BAHL R,ROY,MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ J,JOAN.Making the Property Tax Work.Lincoln Institute of Land Policy:63-102.
  • 5HATFIELD J.2013.Revenue decentralization,the local income tax deduction,and the provision of public goods[J].National Tax Journal,66:97-116.
  • 6MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ J,NOISET L,RIDER M.2010.Assignment of property tax:should developing countries follow the conventional views[M]∥BAHL R,MARTINEZ-VAZQUEZ J,YOUNGMAN J.Challenging the Conventiona Wisdom on the Property Tax.Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
  • 7MUSGRAVE R.1959.The theory of public finance[M]McG raw-Hill.
  • 8OATES W.1972.Fiscal federalism[M].Harcourt Brac Jovanovich.
  • 9TIEBOUT M.1956.A pure theory of local expenditures[J].Th Journal of Political Economy,64:416-424.
  • 10ZODROW G.2002.The property tax as a capital tax:a room with tree views[J].National Tax Journal,54(1):139-156.

引证文献4

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部