期刊文献+

重提“审判中心主义” 被引量:6

Reconsideration of “Trial Centralism”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在"侦查中心主义"的消解影响下,长期以来我国刑事审判职能在查明事实、认定证据方面的实质效用得不到充分发挥,呈现出"形式化"这一可怕的司法惯性特征。对此,十八届四中全会强调要"推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革"并"保证庭审在查明事实、认定证据、保护诉权、公正裁判中发挥决定性作用"。重提"审判中心主义"必须在界分与其他主义关系的基础上,重新审视其与案卷移送方式、无罪判决率和案件证明标准之间的认识误区,将强化以庭审为中心的事实认定机制作为改革的突破口,借力贯彻直接言词原则、坚持疑罪从无、继续推动辩护律师程序参与等措施根除旧病。 In the negative influence of "investigation centralism", for quite a long period of time, the substantial effectiveness of China's criminal justice functions such as fact-fingding, evidence-determination did not give a full play. To make things worse, it shows a terrble judicial inertia feature of "formalization". In view of this condition, the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee emphasized to "promote a reform of lawsuit system focusing on trial" and "ensure the decisive effect of the court trial in fact-fingding, evidence-determination, right of action and fair judgement". On the basis of of discriminating the related "-isms", reconsideration of "trial centralism" should reexamine misunderstangdings on the files' transfer, acquittal rate and the case proof standard, strenthen the reform breakthrough of fact-finding mechanism centered on court trial, fully carry out the direct testimony principle, and adhere to the principle of no ounishment in doubtful cases to eradicate the old illness.
作者 李章仙
出处 《石河子大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2015年第5期39-47,共9页 Journal of Shihezi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 审判中心 侦查中心 庭审实质化 司法惯性 trial centralism investigation centralism trial essentiality judicial inertia
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1张建伟.审判中心主义的实质与表象[N].人民法院报,2014-06-20(5).
  • 2龙宗智.论建立以一审庭审为中心的事实认定机制[J].中国法学,2010(2):143-157. 被引量:172
  • 3程雷.审判公开背景下刑事庭审实质化的进路[J].法律适用,2014(12):2-6. 被引量:19
  • 4刘磊.“起诉书一本主义”之省思[J].环球法律评论,2007,29(2):88-97. 被引量:19
  • 5吴学安.无罪判决率走低与需要矫治的司法痼疾[E/OL].[2015-01-08]http://media.workeren.en/sites/media/grrb/2014_03/29/GR0611.htm.
  • 6王禄生.极低无罪辩护率背后的四大真相[E/OL][2015-01-28].http://www,21eeom.net/articles&gyj/fzyj/artiele_2012112271548.html.
  • 7孙红皋,周光富.默契与冲突:基层法院、检察院关系研究[C].第三届国家高级检察官论坛论文集,2007.
  • 8Bordenkircher v. Hayes,434 U.S. 357,364 (1978).
  • 9王梅英.阅卷权之限制[J].台湾本土法学杂志,2003,(48):139-141.
  • 10[日]松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法[M].丁相顺译,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005:6.

二级参考文献66

共引文献497

同被引文献38

引证文献6

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部