摘要
近代中国行政诉讼立法因仿效日本《行政裁判法》体例,对行政审判的法源问题未予规定。大理院及司法院解释亦出现了空白。而南京国民政府行政法院在审判实践中,除立法院制定的法律与各级行政机关制定的法规外,对《训政时期约法》、司法院解释、判例、习惯以及法律原理等规范形式,均实现了作为法源的适用。
Since modern Chinese administrative procedural legislation followed the style of the Japanese Administrative Litigation Law, the law resource of the administrative trial was not provided. Neither did the related interpretation of Daliyuan nor judicial yuan. However, in the judicial practice of the Nanjing national government administrative court, besides laws and regulations made by the Legislative Yuan and levels of administrative organs, there were also application of law resource for regulation forms of the Provisional Constitution of Training Period, judicial yuan interpretation, legal precedents, custom and legal principles.
出处
《行政法学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第6期38-50,共13页
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW
关键词
行政审判
法源
行政法院
Administrative Trial
Source of law
Administrative Court