期刊文献+

全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉在胸部手术中的麻醉效果分析 被引量:6

Analysis of anesthetic effect by general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in thoracic operation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨在胸部手术中运用全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉的效果。方法 156例胸科手术患者随机分为对照组和观察组,各78例。对照组给予全身麻醉,观察组给予全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉。比较两组患者术前、术中、术后的收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(Sp O2)以及拔管时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、完全清醒时间、术后不良反应发生率。结果观察组术中、术后SBP、DBP、MAP、HR监测指标低于对照组,观察组拔管时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、完全清醒时间短于对照组,不良反应发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉应用在胸部手术中,效果显著,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate anesthetic effect by general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia in thoracic operation. Methods A total of 156 patient receiving thoracic operation were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 78 cases in each group. The control group received general anesthesia, and the observation group received general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia. Comparisons were made on their systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) before, during and after operation, extubation time, spontaneous breathing recovery time, fully awake time, and incidence of postoperative adverse reactions between the two groups: Results The observation group had all lower SBP, DBP, MAP, HR during and after operation than the control group, and its extubation time, spontaneous breathing recovery time, and fully awake time were shorter than those in the control group. The observation group also had lower incidence of adverse reactions than the control group. Their differences all had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion Combination of general anesthesia and epidural anesthesia provides precise effect in thoracic operation. This method is worth clinical promotion and application.
作者 常海林
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2015年第22期9-10,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词 胸部手术 全身麻醉 硬膜外阻滞 Thoracic operation General anesthesia Epidural anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献22

  • 1彭学勇,许秋平,符慧敏.全麻复合胸段硬膜外麻在开胸手术中的应用[J].中国冶金工业医学杂志,2005,22(4):462-463. 被引量:3
  • 2季?,陈昆洲,杨晏芳,高玉华.硬膜外阻滞加气管内全麻与单纯气管内全麻用于全胃切除术的对比研究[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1995,15(2):74-76. 被引量:88
  • 3梁华,陶国才,郭永军,王立文,马秀光,扬焕杰,贺亚琳.全麻复合硬膜外阻滞用于老年高血压患者上腹部手术[J].西北国防医学杂志,2005,26(5):357-359. 被引量:15
  • 4Kreuer S, Wilhelm W, Grundmann U, et al. Narcotrend index versus bispectral index as electroencephalogram propofol anesthesia, measures of anesthetic drug effect during propofol anesthesia[ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2004,98:692-697.
  • 5Denman WT. Pediatric evaluation of the bispectal index(BIS) monitor and correlation of BIS with end-tidal sevoflurane concentration in infants and children[ J]. Anesth Analg,2000,90(4) :872-877.
  • 6Katoh T, Bito H, Sato S. Influence of Age on Hypnotic Requirement, Bispectral Index, and 95% Spectral Edge Frequency Associated with Sedation Induced by sevoflurane [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2000,92 : 55 .61.
  • 7Sebel PS, Lang E, Rampil IJ, et al. A multicenter study of bispectral electroencephalogram analysis for monitoring anesthetic effect [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1997,84:891-899.
  • 8Luginbuhl M, Wuthrich S, Petersen-Felix S, et al. Different benefit of bispectal index(BIS) in desflurane and propofol anesthesia [ J ]. A cta Anaesthesiol Scand ,2003,47 : 165-173.
  • 9Hodgson PS, Liu SS. Epidural lidocaine decreases sevoflurane requirement for adequate depth of anesthesia as measured by the bispectral index monitor [ J ]. Anesthesiology,2001,94:799-803.
  • 10Senturk M, Pembeci K, Menda F, et ai. Effects of intramuscular administration of lidocaine or bupivacaine on induction and maintenance doses of propofol evaluated by bispectral index[ J ]. Br J Anaesth,2002, 89:849-852.

共引文献49

同被引文献30

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部