摘要
辩侦交易作为一种取证手段适用于特定案件,可以提高侦查效益。贪污贿赂犯罪的特点和新的《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》的有关修改,决定了将辩侦交易引入贪污贿赂犯罪侦查过程是必要的,且具有可行性。辩侦交易在实践中可能会存在一定的风险或出现相关问题,应遵循一定的原则严格使用,包括贯彻法治原则、必要性原则、有限适度原则、双方自愿原则和诚实信用原则等。在实践中,辩侦交易的近似形态有我国"坦白从宽"刑事政策和贿赂犯罪的有关规定、美国"刑事免责"制度,以及"污点证人豁免"制度,它们虽然不具有前述辩侦交易的全部要件,却具有辩侦交易的内核和意旨。
Plea Bargaining can improve the efficiency of the investigation as a forensic means to a particular case. The characteristics of crimes of embezzlement and bribery and the new revision of the people's Republic of China Criminal Procedure Law determine the necessity of introducing the Plea Bargaining into the investigation of corruption and bribery process and it is feasible. The use of Plea Bargaining should be strictly limited as the practice might cause some risks or relevant problems. The application should be in line with the rule of law principle, ne- cessity principle, limited moderation principle, the duel voluntary principle and the principle of trust and faith. In practice, the approximate form of Plea Bargaining in our country is similar to "frankness and leniency" criminal policy, "criminal free responsibility system" and the "guilty witness immunity system" of the United States. A1- though they do not have all the factors of Plea Bargaining, they do have the kernel and intention of the Plea Bar- gaining
出处
《洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版)》
2015年第5期59-65,共7页
Journal of Luoyang Institute of Science and Technology:Social Science Edition
关键词
辩侦交易
贪污贿赂犯罪侦查
侦查效益
Plea Bargaining
investigation of the crime of bribery and embezzlement
investigation efficiency