锁定钢板在老年人肱骨近端脆性骨折治疗中的价值分析被引量：2

Analysis the Value of Locking Plate in Treatment of Elderly Patients With Proximal Humerus Fracture

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的探讨锁定钢板在老年人肱骨近端脆性骨折治疗中的价值。方法将60例肱骨近端脆性骨折老年患者分为观察组(锁定钢板)和对照组(克氏针),对比两组治疗效果。结果观察组治疗总优良率为93.3%,高于对照组治疗总优良率为73.3%,P<0.05,差异具有统计学意义。结论锁定钢板在老年人肱骨近端脆性骨折治疗中有着较好的临床效果。 Objective To investigate the value of locking plate in the treatment of fracture of the proximal humerus in elderly patients.Methods Selected 60 cases of fractures of the proximal humerus fractures were divided into the observation group （locking plate） and the control group （G＇s needle）, compared with the treatment effect of the two groups.Results The total excellent and good rate of the observation group was 93.3%, the control group was 73.3%, the observation group was higher than the control group,P〈0.05, had difference statistically signiifcance.Conclusion Locking plate has better clinical effect in the treatment of elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures.

作者张龙吉

机构地区吉林市人民医院

出处《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第29期123-124,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education

关键词锁定钢板老年人肱骨近端脆性骨折 Locking plate Aged Fracture of proximal humerus

分类号 R683 [医药卫生—骨科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献5

1刘晓峰,董启榕,徐又佳,周海斌,徐炜,谢宗刚,茅泳涛.锁定钢板治疗老年人肱骨近端脆性骨折32例临床研究[J].重庆医学,2015,44(5):690-692. 被引量：16
2姚勇.锁定钢板内固定联合自体植骨治疗老年桡骨远端骨质疏松性骨折的效果观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2014,5(21):74-75. 被引量：9
3张强.观察锁定钢板治疗老年人肱骨近端脆性骨折的临床疗效[J].世界最新医学信息文摘,2015,15(23). 被引量：5
4钱俊,乔高山,夏建中,印文彩.锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的疗效观察[J].中国卫生标准管理,2014,5(18):82-84. 被引量：17
5林冬杰,蔡延禄,陈万安.康复治疗对肱骨近端骨折患者内固定术后肩关节功能的影响[J].中国医学创新,2014,11(2):130-132. 被引量：21

二级参考文献36

1冯刚,王剑,潘志军,郑强,李杭.肱骨近端锁定钢板治疗老年人肱骨近端骨折[J].浙江医学,2006,28(2):130-131. 被引量：9
2Kennedy A. Martinez K .C'luiang CC,et al. Saturated fattyacid-mediated inflammation and insulin resistance in adi-pose tisvsue: mechanisms of action and implicaiions[J]. JNutr.2009.139(1)-1-4.
3Kontakis G? Koutras C, Tosounidis T,et al. Early man-agement of proximal humeral fractures with hemiarthro-plasty: a systematic review [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2008,90(11):1407-1413.
4Solberg BD? Moon CN, Franco DP, et al. Surgical treat-ment of three and four-part proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) ,2009,91 (7): 1689-1697.
5Boileau P,Caligaris-Cordero B,Payeur F,et al. Prognosticfactors during rehabilitation after shoulder prostheses forfracture[J]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot,1999,85(2):106-116.
6Dines DM, Warren RF, Ahchek DW, et al. Posttraumaticchanges of the proximal humerus: malunion,nonunion,and osteonecrosis. Treatment with modular hemiarthro-plasty or total shoulder arthroplasty[J], J Shoulder El-bow Surg,1993,2(1):11-21.
7Bjrkenheim JM, Pajarinen J , Savolainen V. Internal fixa-tion of proximal humeral fractures with a locking com-pression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patientsfollowed for a minimum of 1 year [J]. Acta OrthopScand,2004,75(6) :741-745.
8Walsh S? Reindl R,Harvey E, et al. Biomechanical com-parison of a unique locking plate versus a standard platefor internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in acadaveric model[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon),2006,21(10);1027-1031.
9Meyer C, Ah V,Hassanin C,et al. The arteries of the hu-meral head and their relevance in fracture treatment[J].Surg Radiol Anat,2005,27(3) :232-237.
10Brooks CH * Revell WJ, Heatley FW. Vascularity of thehumeral head after proximal humeral fractures. An ana-tomical cadaver study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1993,75(1):132-136.