期刊文献+

质量管理实践与企业创新真的相悖吗?——以组织学习为中介变量的实证研究 被引量:18

Are Quality Management Practices Against Firm Innovation?——Mediating Role of Organizational Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 质量管理实践和创新管理是企业获取竞争优势的两种途径,但对于两者之间的关系一直存在争论.本文在国内外文献回顾的基础上探讨了质量管理柔性实践和硬性实践对企业创新绩效的影响,构建了组织学习对质量管理实践和企业创新绩效关系影响的中介模型,通过162家制造企业的数据检验相关假设.实证结果表明,质量管理柔性实践和硬性实践不仅对企业创新绩效有显著正向作用,而且两者的交互项显著影响企业创新绩效,两者匹配项的作用不显著.探索性学习在柔性实践与企业创新绩效关系间起着部分中介作用,利用性学习在硬性实践与企业创新绩效关系间起着完全中介作用. Quality management practices( QMP) and innovation management are two ways for companies to get competitive advantage. There's been a debate about the relationship between these two factors. The influence of soft QMP and hard QMP on innovation performance was analyzed based on literature review. It aimed to extend understanding of the impact of QMP on innovation performance by investigating the mediating effect of organizational learning on this relationship. A proposed research model and the hypotheses were testified by using survey data from 162 manufacturing firms. The results indicate that not only soft QMP and hard QMP have direct positive impact on innovation performance,but also their interacting term has direct effect. Moreover,explorative learning has partial mediation effect between soft QMP and innovation performance,while exploitative learning has full mediation effect between hard QMP and innovation performance.
作者 奉小斌
出处 《研究与发展管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期88-98,共11页 R&D Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"集群新创企业平行搜索的内涵结构 作用机制与演化机理研究"(71302125) 浙江省自然科学基金资助项目"浙江集群新创企业跨界搜索及其对产品创新的影响研究:基于竞争者行动的视角"(LQ13G020016) 浙江省社科联重点研究课题"浙江集群企业质量管理实践促进创新的机理与路径研究"(2013Z47)
关键词 质量管理实践 柔性实践 硬性实践 创新绩效 组织学习 quality management practice(QMP) soft QMP hard QMP innovation performance organizational learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1姜鹏,苏秦,张鹏伟.质量管理实践与企业绩效关系模型研究——扩展知识路径的研究视角[J].科学学研究,2013,31(6):904-912. 被引量:20
  • 2Powell T C. Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1995,16( 1 ) :5 - 27.
  • 3Dow D, Samson D, Ford S. Exploding the myth:Do all quality management practices contribute to superior qual- ity performance? [ J]. Production and Operations Management, 1999,8 (1):1 -27.
  • 4李军锋,龙勇,杨秀苔.质量管理的核心活动与基础活动——重庆制造业的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2009,12(6):150-157. 被引量:14
  • 5Hung R Y Y, Lien B Y, Yang B Y, et al. Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry [ J ]. International Business Review,2011,20 (2) :213 -225.
  • 6Zhang D L, Linderman K, Schroeder R G. The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices [ J 1. Journal of Operations Management,2012,30 ( 1 ) : 12 - 23.
  • 7Kim D Y, Kumar V, Kumar U. Relationship between quality management practices and innovation [ J ]. Journal of Ooerations Management ,2012,30 ( 4 ) :295 - 315.
  • 8梁欣如,许庆瑞.TQM是否阻碍了全员创新?——TQM的管理控制模式与全员创新模式[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2006,6(2):48-53. 被引量:10
  • 9Ooi K B, Lin B, Teh P L, et al. Does TQM support innovation performance in Malaysia's manufacturing indus- try .9 [ J 7. Journal of Business Economics and Management,2012,13 (2) :366 - 393.
  • 10Prajogo D I, Hong S W. The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms [ Jl. Technovation,2008,28 (12) :855 - 863.

二级参考文献228

  • 1温忠麟,张雷,侯杰泰,刘红云.中介效应检验程序及其应用[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):614-620. 被引量:7615
  • 2张洪石,陈劲.突破性创新的组织模式研究[J].科学学研究,2005,23(4):566-571. 被引量:68
  • 3刘凤朝,潘雄锋,施定国.基于集对分析法的区域自主创新能力评价研究[J].中国软科学,2005(11):83-91. 被引量:195
  • 4黄俊,刘静,李传昭.供应商早期参与新产品开发的实证研究[J].科研管理,2007,28(1):167-172. 被引量:16
  • 5March, J. G. Contiuity and change in theories of organizational action [ J ]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1996, 41 : 278 - 287.
  • 6Vanhaverbeke, W. , Beerkens, B. & Duysters, G. Explorative and exploitative learning strategies in technology - based alliance networks, Eds (Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies) Working Paper, 2003.
  • 7Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R.E. An organizational learning framework : from intuition to institution [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24 ( 3 ) : 532 - 537.
  • 8Lee, J. , Lee, L. & Lee, H. Exploration and exploitation in the presences of network externalities [ J ]. Management Science, 2003, 49 : 553 - 570.
  • 9Gupta, A. K. , Smith, K. G. & Shalley, C. E. The interplay between exploration and exploitation [ J ]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(4): 693 -706.
  • 10March, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[ J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2( 1 ) : 71 - 87.

共引文献211

同被引文献162

引证文献18

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部