期刊文献+

国际法院争端岛礁判例及其法理原则对我国南海维权的启示 被引量:2

A Case Study of ICJ to the Controversy Reef and Its Internal Legal Structure:The Enlightenment to the Right of South China Sea
下载PDF
导出
摘要 国际法院作为联合国的主要司法机关,在解决国际争端中起着重要作用。国际法院的一些判决案例反映着领土主权理论的发展,其在以后的案件中往往援引先前相似案件的判决理由,以维护其司法的一贯性。本文从国际法院新近的岛礁判例来分析其在进行判决时所采用的关键性依据,并总结其内在法理结构,为中国以后的南海维权行动提供参考。 The International Court of Justice ( ICJ), the principal judicial dispute of the U. N. , plays a significant role in the settlement of international dispute. The development of Territorial Sovereignty theory is also reflected by some court decisions made by the ICJ. The previous similar cases, meanwhile, are often quoted as reference by the subsequent judicial cases to maintain the consistency of justice. Based on the judicial system of ICJ, this paper makes a case study of the current new islands. With the analysis of its key basis of the court decisions, the paper summarizes the internal legal structure and provides a reference for China in the future practice of safeguarding South China Sea rights action.
作者 杨珍奇
出处 《东南亚研究》 CSSCI 2015年第5期41-46,共6页 Southeast Asian Studies
基金 湛江市社科联2014年青年项目"徐闻‘海上丝绸之路’古港与湛江文化旅游研究"(ZJ14QN04) 广东海洋大学2014年人文社科项目"影响21世纪海上丝绸之路建设的东盟因素分析"
关键词 国际法院 岛礁 《联合国海洋法公约》 International Court of Justice Reef United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献258

  • 1赵理海.从国际法看我国对南海诸岛无可争辩的主权[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1992,29(3):32-42. 被引量:32
  • 2王秀芬.中国海洋行政执法主体研究[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2005,4(1):16-18. 被引量:7
  • 3李伟芳.论国际法渊源的几个问题[J].法学评论,2005,23(4):52-57. 被引量:18
  • 4孙世彦.中国的国际法学:问题与思考[J].政法论坛,2005,23(4):30-40. 被引量:20
  • 5吴慧.国际海洋法争端解决机制对钓鱼岛争端的影响[J].国际关系学院学报,2007(4):22-33. 被引量:19
  • 6ICJ.Case Concerning the Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain,para.231[EB/OL].国际法院网站,(2001-03-06)[2009-10-22].http://www.icj-eij.org/docket/files/87/7027.pdf.
  • 7ICJ.Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria,para.288[EB/OL].国际法院网站,(2002-10-10)[2010-09-28].http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/94/7453.pdf.
  • 8ICJ.Case Concerning Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea,para.271[EB/OL].国际法院网站,(2007-10-08)[2009-06-20].http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/120/14075.pdf.
  • 9ICJ.Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea between Romania and Ukraine,para.120[EB/OL].国际法院网站,(2009-02-03)[2009-05-28].http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/132/14987.pdf.
  • 10PCIJ.Legal status of Eastern Greenland case,Series AB,No 5[EB/OL].常设国际法院网站,[2009-11-301.http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_AB/AB_48/01_Groenland_ordonnance_19320802.pdf.

共引文献49

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部