期刊文献+

分析Thumper心肺复苏机与徒手心肺复苏抢救心脏呼吸骤停患者的临床效果 被引量:16

Clinical Effects Analysis of Thumper Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation(CPR) machine and Unarmed CPR in Arrest of Cardiac and Respiratory Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:Thumper心肺复苏机与徒手心肺复苏抢救心脏呼吸骤停患者的临床治疗效果。方法:统计分析2011年8月-2013年8月我院收治的87例心脏呼吸骤停患者的临床资料。结果:心肺复苏后15min,观察组患者的Pa O2明显比对照组高(P〈0.05),Pa CO2明显比对照组低(P〈0.05);心肺复苏30min,观察组患者的Pa O2、Sa O2均明显比对照组高(P〈0.05),Pa CO2明显比对照组低(P〈0.05);观察组患者的复苏有效率83.7%(41/49)明显比对照组63.2%(24/38)高(P〈0.05),副反应发生率12.2%(6/49)明显比对照组39.5%(15/38)低(P〈0.05)。结论:Thumper心肺复苏机抢救心脏呼吸骤停患者的临床治疗效果较徒手心肺复苏好。 Objective: To analyze the clinical treatment effects of Thumper CPR machine and unarmed CPR in the arrest of cardiac and respiratory patients.Methods:The clinical data of 87 cases of cardiac and respiratory patients arrested in our hospital from August 2011 to August 2013 were statistically analyzed.Results:The Pa O2 15 min after cardiopulmonary resuscitation of the observation group was significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.05), the Pa CO2 was significantly lower than the control group(P〈0.05); The Pa O2, Sa O2 30 min after cardiopulmonary resuscitation were significantly higher than the control group(P〈0.05), the Pa CO2 was significantly lower than the control group(P〈0.05); The resuscitation efficiency 83.7%(41/49) was significantly higher than the control group 63.2%(24/38)(P〈0.05), the Vice-reaction rate 12.2%(6/49) was significantly lower than the control group 39.5%(15/38)(P〈0.05). Conclusion:The clinical effect of Thumper CPR machine in the rescue of patients with cardiac and respiratory is better than unarmed CPR.
作者 肖广显
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2015年第10期992-993,996,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 Thumper心肺复苏机 徒手心肺复苏 心脏呼吸骤停 临床治疗效果 Thumper CPR machine Unarmed CPR Cardiac and respiratory arrest Clinical treatment effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献39

共引文献69

同被引文献139

引证文献16

二级引证文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部