摘要
1956年秋收至次年春夏,农村发生的"少数人闹事"是一种群体性事件。这类群体性事件的发生既有合作社分配没搞好、政策未落实、组织管理僵化、干部作风不民主等因素,还与基层组织对群体性事件的危害缺乏认识有关。农村"少数人闹事"本质上不是反对合作化,而是维护自身利益的"无权者的抵制"行为。基层组织对群体性事件的应对比较迟缓。对"少数人闹事"的性质,最初多认为是人民内部矛盾,但随着反右斗争的展开,在农村两条道路大辩论中,对其性质作出了超出人民内部矛盾范畴的定位。从法治层面而言,农村"少数人闹事"凸显出法律缺位。
The trouble- making of some people in the countryside was regarded as mass disturbance in 1956. This had much to do with both the unfair distribution and the lack of the harm of such event in the primary-level organization. The nature of such event was first defined as contradiction among the people but later as the anti- Rightist struggle unfolded,it was positioned out of such a cope. And from perspective of the law,trouble- making in the countryside highlighted the legal vacancy.
出处
《史林》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期175-184,222,共10页
Historical Review
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"中苏同盟与1950年代中国社会"(项目编号:14JJD770031)的阶段性研究成果