国际商事仲裁司法化的正当性研究

Study on International Commercial Arbitration Judicial Legitimacy

自联合国国际贸易法委员会《国际商事仲裁示范法》出台以来,国际商事仲裁呈现司法化趋势。仲裁机构的涉外仲裁活动受司法机关的监督或协助,并开始突破当事人意思自治的范畴。国际商事仲裁的司法化是否具有正当性,需要从价值追求的角度为其寻求理论支撑。仲裁与司法的关系错综复杂,各种观点仁智有别。研究如何在仲裁与司法之间实现更好的互动,或说司法化如何做到更加合理以符合仲裁的实质利益,对于促进我国涉外仲裁工作具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。

Since UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration was promulgated, international commercial arbi-tration has shown a trend of judicialization. Foreign-related arbitration activities of arbitration institution are subject to supervision and assist by judicial offices, and begin to break through the client＆#39;s autonomy. Whether the judicialization of international commer-cial arbitration has legitimacy needs to seek theoretical support from the perspective of value pursuit. The relationship between arbi-tration and judicial is complex. There exist various opinions. The research on how to achieve a better interaction between arbitration and judiciary, namely how to achieve more rational judicialization in accordance with substantial benefit of the arbitration, has an important practical significance and theoretical significance for promoting foreign-related arbitration work in our country.