摘要
2015年《关于审理民间借贷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》对利息之债采取了多元化定性及处理,除无效债、完全债以外,尚有易受忽略的自然债。自然债是符合一般道德观念要求的法律没有强制力但维护其自愿履行后果,故给付人不得请求返还,受领人有权受领并保有给付的债,它也是民法上债的有机组成部分。利息给付之债的民法规制为自然债保留了空间,自然债主要存在于民间借贷多种情况下的利息给付中。新司法解释的规定无疑会使民法自然债这一独特范畴彰显其存在价值。
The 2015 judicial interpretation ＂Provisions on the application of law in the trial of the case of private lending＂ defines and deals with interest obligation in different ways, which includes invalid obligation, civil obligation and natural obligation which is easily overlooked. Natural Obligation refers to obligations within which a giving is without enforceability but voluntary performance shall entitle maintenance of holding effect, which is an integral component of civil law obligation system. Legal regulations on interest payment obligation reserve space for natural obligation, and natural obligations exist in many kinds of situations of private lending interest payments. The new judicial interpretation undoubtedly embodies the value of the unique category natural obligation.
出处
《四川文理学院学报》
2015年第6期24-29,共6页
Sichuan University of Arts and Science Journal
基金
国家社科基金项目"自然债与我国债法完善之研究"(09CFX047)
关键词
利息给付
民法自然债
民间借贷
司法解释
interest payment
natural obligation
private lending
judicial interpretation
