法治普遍性下我国刑法解释的应然分析——以侵财犯罪中概括型数额的司法解释为例证

Idealistic Analysis of Criminal Law Interpretation Under the Universality of Rule of Law——Illustrated by the Judicial Interpretations of the Summary Amounts of Property-Related Crimes

法治普遍性下,刑法解释的应然状态是统一性与差异性的协调,需管控差异性,而强调统一性。刑法解释的应然主体是全国人大常委会和最高人民法院,由最高人民法院行使刑法解释权,全国人大常委会、最高人民检察院监督最高人民法院司法解释的制定、实施。侵财类犯罪中概括型数额的司法解释应当选择相对确定的数额标准,采"上年度犯罪地城镇(农村)居民人均可支配收入",并辅之以居民消费价格指数,范围上限定在地(市)一级比较合适。同时,结合比例(倍数)模式以解决跨地区相同犯罪的累计计算问题。

Under the universality of rule of law,the idealistic state of Criminal Law Interpretations is the coordination of the unity and the differences,which needs to control the differences but emphasize the unity. The idealism interpreters are NPC Standing Committee and Supreme Court,and the power of criminal explanation should be carried out by the Supreme Court,while the NPC Standing Committee and Supreme Procuratorate may supervise the Supreme Court＇s behaviors of the formulation and implementation of the judicial interpretations. The judicial interpretations of the summary amounts of property- related crimes should choose the relative standards of amounts,adopting to＂the per capita disposable income of city dwellers or rural residents in criminal areal last year＂with the consumer price index in assistant,and also limit its range to the prefecture level cites as comparatively desirable. Meanwhile,we can solve the problem of aggregate calculation of the same crimes in different regions with the mode of proportions or multiples.