期刊文献+

PRA、MICA抗体对肾移植转归的影响 被引量:1

The effect of panel reactive antibodies and MICA antibodies on renal transplantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ⅰ、Ⅱ类群体反应性抗体、MICA抗体对肾移植恢复的影响。方法本实验室应用免疫磁珠法检测术前、术后1、2、4周肾移植患者体内群体反应性抗体及MICA抗体,共检测700人次。结果术前男性抗体阳性率24%(63/262),女性抗体阳性率40%(46/116),术后延迟恢复组与急性排斥组的群体反应性抗体Ⅰ、Ⅱ类、MICA抗体均高于正常恢复组。结论群体反应性抗体I、Ⅱ类及MICA抗体与移植恢复关系密切,术前抗体筛选及术后抗体检测对肾移植意义重大。 Objective To explore the relationship between panel reactive antibody (PRA) class Ⅰ, class Ⅱ, MICA antibody and recovery of renal transplantation. Methods Immunomagnetic beads-LUMINEX method was used to detect PRA class Ⅰ, class Ⅱ and MICA antibodies in patients awaiting for transplantation and one, two and four weeks after renal trans- plantation. A total of 700 eases (378 patients) were detected sineeDeeember 2013. Results The positive antibody rate was 24% in male patients awaiting for transplantation, 40% in female patients awaiting for transplantation. The positive rates of PRA Ⅰ , Ⅱ and MICA antibodies were higher in patients with normal recovery than in patients with delayed graft function. Conduslon A close relationship exists between PRA class Ⅰ, Class Ⅱ , MICA antibody and transplantation. It is impor- tant to identify the presence of PRA class Ⅰ, class Ⅱ, MICA antibody before and after renal transplantation.
出处 《中国输血杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第10期1201-1203,共3页 Chinese Journal of Blood Transfusion
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(81570676)
关键词 群体反应性抗体 MICA抗体 肾移植 PRA MICA ab renal transplantation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mao Q, Terasaki PI, Cai J, et al. Extremely high association be- tween appearance of HLA antibodies and failure of kidney afts in a five-year longitudinal study. Am J Transplant,2007, 7(4) :$64- $71.
  • 2傅茜,王长希,曾文涛,陈立中.肾移植受者术前HLA特异性抗体筛查(附3500例报告)[J].中国免疫学杂志,2009,25(2):143-145. 被引量:8
  • 3Malheiro J, Tafulo S, Dias L, et al. Analysis of preformed donor- specific anti-HLA antibodies characteristics for prediction of anti- body-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. Transpl Immu- nol,2015,32(2) :66-71.
  • 4Kaczmarczyk M, Kotfis K, Biernawska J, et al. Effect of recipient sensitization (peak panel reactive antibodies) on 15-year survival after kidney transplantation. Transplant Prec, 2014, 46 ( 8 ) : 2699-2702.
  • 5Everly M J, Rebellato LM, Ozawa M, et al. Beyond histology: Lowering human leukocyte antigen antibody to improve renal al- lograft survival in acute rejection. Transplantation,2010, 899 (8) : 962-967.
  • 6I.obashevsky AL, Higgins NG, Rosner KM, et al. Analysis of anti- HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates subjected to desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab. Transplantation, 2013,96(2) :182-190.
  • 7Kurtulmu Y1 ,Ayna TK, SoySz M, et al. Comparision of anti- HLA antibodies of kidney transplant candidates with chronic renal failure by two different methods: Flow-PRA and Luminex PRA. Transplant Proc ,2013,45 ( 3 ) :875-877.
  • 8Atouf O, Brick C, Essakalli M. Detection of HLA antibodies by Luminex and kidney transplantation decision making: a case re- port. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) ,2014 ,2(6) :739-742.
  • 9Visentin J, Marroc M, Guidicelli G, et al. Clinical impact of pre- formed donor-specific denatured class I HLA antibodies after kid- ney transplantation. Clin Transplant,2015,29(5 ) :393-402.
  • 10Vaidya S1. Synthesis of new and memory HLA antibodies from a- cute and chronic rejections versus pregnancies and bloodtransfu- sions. Transplant Proc,2005,37(2) :648-649.

二级参考文献10

共引文献9

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部