期刊文献+

产品市场竞争、成长性与股票特质性波动——基于中国上市公司的经验证据 被引量:3

Product Market Competition,Growth and Stock Idiosyncratic Volatility:Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文以沪深A股上市公司2000~2012年数据为样本,检验"竞争—风险"("PMC—风险")关联,研究发现:中国资本市场的特质性波动已处于较高水平,且具有明显的阶段性波动特征;"PMC—风险"的非线性关联(U型),即产品市场的适度竞争能有效缓解特质性波动,而日趋激烈的产品市场竞争会显著加剧特质性波动。成长性差异是影响"PMC—风险"效应的一个关键环境变量,处于新兴/转轨经济背景下的中国上市公司普遍面临的高成长压力是加剧其产品市场竞争并进而引致股票回报显著波动的一个重要推手,高成长压力具有"竞争加剧效应"。 Based on the sample of the listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share data from2000 to 2012,this paper further investigates the connection of'PMC-Risk'.We find that China's listed companies' IR has been at a higher level,and has a clear characteristic of periodic fluctuations,and the correlation of'PMC-Risk'is nonlinear(U-shape),that is,firms' significant product market power can effectively weaken the IR and stabilize the firms' stock return.Growth difference is the important environmental factors that significantly affect the relationship of 'PMCRisk',this paper also firstly points out that high growth pressure is an important promoter which intensifies the PMC and leads to significant volatility of stock returns under the background of the emerging/transitional economy in China,and high growth pressure has the effect of increasing competition.
出处 《中南财经政法大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期127-137,160,共11页 Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"公司治理(环境) 产品市场竞争与股票特质性风险"(71262006) 中国博士后科学基金面上一等资助项目"国企治理 产品市场竞争与股票特质性波动研究"(2014M560822) "全国会计领军(后备)人才"计划 新疆生产建设兵团优秀博士后资助计划 石河子大学农林经济管理博士后流动站资助计划 石河子大学"3152"高层次人才支持计划 石河子大学高层次人才专项"行业竞争结构 企业风险与新疆兵团产业绩效"(RCSX201101)
关键词 特质性波动 产品市场竞争 适度竞争 成长性 Idiosyncratic Volatility Moderate Competition Growth Differences Product Market Competition(PMC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Durnev, A., Morck, R., Yeung,B.Value-enhancing Capital Budgeting and Firm-specific Stock Return Variation [J].Journalof Finance,2004,25(1):65- 105.
  • 2Ferreira, M., Laux, P.Corporate Governance, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Information Flow[J].Journal of Finance, 2007,62(2):951- 989.
  • 3Brockman, P., Yah, X. Block Ownership and Firm-specific Information [J].Journal of Banking & Finance, 2009,33(2) :308-316.
  • 4Brandt, M. W., Alon, B., John, R. G., Alok, K. The Idiosyncratic Volatility Puzzle : Time Trend or Speculative Episodes? EJ2.Review of Financial Studies, 2010,23 (2) : 863-899.
  • 5Gaspar,Jose Miguel, Massimo, M.Idiosyncratic Volatility and Product Market Competition[J].Journal of Busi ness,2006,79(6) :3125-3152.
  • 6Brown, G., Kapadia, N.Firm specific Risk and Equity Market Development[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2007,84(2):358- 388.
  • 7Peress,J.Product Market Competition, Insider Trading and Stock Market Efficiency[J].Journal of Finance, 2010,65(1):1- 43.
  • 8Ang, A., Hodrick, R., Xing, Y., Zhang, X. High Idiosyncratic Volatility and Low Returns: International and Further U.S. Evidence[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2009,91 ( 1 ) : 1-23.
  • 9Dasgupta,A. ,Prat, A., Verardo, M. Institutional Trade Persistence and Long-term Equity Returns[J].Journal of Finance,2011,66(2):635- 653.
  • 10Panousi, V. ,Papanikolaou,D.Investment, Idiosyncratic Risk, and Ownership[J].Journal of Finance, 2012,67 (3) :1113-1148.

二级参考文献164

共引文献281

同被引文献80

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部