期刊文献+

C-BML关键问题研究进展 被引量:5

Key Issues in C-BML:A Survey
下载PDF
导出
摘要 联盟作战管理语言(Coalition Battle Management Language,C-BML)是一种在参与联合作战的指挥控制系统、建模仿真系统、自主机器系统之间表达和交换作战计划、命令、请示、报告等的标准化语言,其目的是为这些系统之间的标准化信息交换提供支持,提高联合作战中各项行动的效率,包括训练、计划和任务执行.在概述C-BML的地位、作用和发展概况后,首先介绍了C-BML的概念和基本结构;然后鉴于C-BML第一阶段标准开发的经验和教训,探讨了C-BML发展路径与开发方法问题;在此基础上,从数据模型、语法、本体、交互协议、服务等方面,分析了C-BML的关键技术问题;最后,总结C-BML的发展和影响,旨在为我军作战管理语言的构建提供方法和技术上的启发和借鉴. The Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) is a standard language for expressing and exchanging plans, orders, requests, and reports across command and control (C2) systems, modeling and simulation systems, and autonomous systems participating in Coalition operations. It is proposed as an interoperability-enabling technology that will support the exchange of information across C2, simulation and robotic systems; and served as an enabler to increase effectiveness of various activities in support of coalition operations - including training, planning and mission execution. In this paper, after an overview of the development and utilization of C-BML, the concept and basic structure of C-BML are described. Then, the development approaches and roadmap of C-BML are further discussed according to the main difficulties in the development of C-BML phase 1. And the key technologies are analyzed in detail from the perspective of data model, grammar ontology, interaction protocol, services, etc. In the end, C-BML's future and its effect on military operations are concluded. The researctl seeks to provide technical and methodological inspiration for the development ours BML.
出处 《指挥与控制学报》 2015年第3期241-253,共13页 Journal of Command and Control
关键词 联盟作战管理语言 互操作 联合磋商指挥控制信息交换数据模型 语法 本体 交互协议 Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML), interoperability, Joint Consultation Command and Control Information Exchange Data Model (JC3IEDM), grammar, ontology, interaction protocol
  • 相关文献

参考文献61

  • 1SISO-STD-011-2014. Standard for coalition battle manage- ment language (C-BML) phase 1, Version 1.0 [S]. 2014.
  • 2RTO T G. Coalition battle management language (C-BML) [R]. Technical Report RTO-TR-MSG-048, NATO Science and Technology Organization, NATO, 2012.
  • 3Galvin K, Hieb M, Tolk A, et al. Coalition battle manage- ment language (C-BML) study group final report [R]. Tech- nical Report SISO-REF-016-2006-V1.0, SISO, 2006.
  • 4Pullen J M, Khimeche L. Advances in systems and technolo- gies toward interoperating operational military C2 and sim- ulation systems [C]// Proceedings of the 19th International Command and Control Research Technology Symposium. Alexandria, VA, USA: CCRP, 2014.
  • 5Schade U, Biermann J, Frey M, et al. From battle manage- ment language (BML) to automatic information fusion [J]. Information Fusion and Geographic Information Systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2007 (10): 84-95.
  • 6Kewley R H, Chatelet S, Hellio A. Coalition battle man- agement language extensions for simulation interoperability[C]// Proceedings of the 2011 Military Modeling & Sim- ulation Symposium. Boston, MA, USA: SCS/ACM, 2011. 53-60.
  • 7Curtis B. Application of coalition battle management lan- guage (C-BML) and C-BML services to live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) simulation environments [C]// Proceed- ings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA: IEEE/SISO, 2011: 2582-2594.
  • 8Remmersmann T, Tiderko A, Schade U. Interacting with multi-robot systems using BML [C]// Proceedings of the 18th International Command and Control Research Tech- nology Symposium, Alexandria, VA, USA: CCRP, 2013.
  • 9彭勇,彭春光,龚建兴,黄柯棣.作战管理语言研究综述[J].系统仿真学报,2009,21(17):5336-5339. 被引量:13
  • 10唐金国.作战管理语言及其发展现状[J].指挥控制与仿真,2008,30(5):9-12. 被引量:10

二级参考文献44

  • 1贾连兴,单维峰,鲁云军,翟成功,刘华.作战仿真研究热点及发展[J].系统仿真学报,2007,19(14):3148-3150. 被引量:16
  • 2LTC Harry Argo. Level 1 Model for Battle Management Language [R/OL]. [2007-4]. http://www.wxxi.org/docs/c4i-repository/bml.pdf.
  • 3Scott A Carey, Martin S Kleiner, Michael R Hieb, Richard Brown. Standardizing Battle Management Language-a Vital Move Towards the Army Transformation [C]// 01F-SIW-067. Orlando, FL, USA: Fall Simulation Interoperation Workshop, 2001.
  • 4Andreas Tolk, Charles Turnitsa. Battle Management Language: A Triangle with Five Sides [C]//06S-SIW-016. Orlando, FL, USA: Fall Simulation Interoperation Workshop, 2006.
  • 5Coalition Battle Management Language Study Group (SG) Officers. Coalition Battle Management Language (C-Bml) Study Group Final Report [R/OL]. [2007-4]. http://www.sisostds.org.
  • 6Saikou Diallo, Andreas Tolk, Chuck Turnitsa. Merging Protocols, Grammar, Representation, and Ontological Approaches in Support of C-Bml [C]// 06S-SIW-008. Orlando, FL, USA: Fall Simulation Interoperation Workshop, 2006.
  • 7Ulrich Schade. Formalizing Battle Management Language: A Grammar for Specifying Orders [C]// 06S-SIW-068. Orlando, FL, USA: Fall Simulation Interoperation Workshop, 2006.
  • 8[2]Curtis Blais,Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML)Study Group Report,30 September 2005.
  • 9[3]C-BML Product Development Group,Product Development Plan Draft(Version 0.31),1 9 January 2007.
  • 10[4]Coalition-Battle Management Language Study Group Final Report,30 September 2005.

共引文献22

同被引文献88

  • 1DoD net-centric data strategy [EB/OL]. [2015-09-23]. http: / / dodcio.defense.gov /Portals/O /Documents/Net- Centric-Dat a-Strategy-2003-05-092.pdf.
  • 2Liggins M E, Hall D L, Llinas J. Handbook of multisensor data fusion: theory and practice, second edition [M]. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008.
  • 3Valiente M C, Barriocanal M R, E G, Sicilial M A. An ontology-based integrated approach to situation awareness for high-level information fusion in C4ISR [C]//C. Salinesi and O. Pastor (Eds.): Advanced Information Systems Engi- neering Workshops, CAiSE 2011 International Workshops. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011. 513-527.
  • 4Smirnov A, Levashova T, Shilov N. Patterns for context- based knowledge fusion in decision support systems [J]. In- formation Fusion, 2015, 21 (5): 114-129.
  • 5Haberlin R J, Costa P C, Laskey K B. Probabilistic ontology architecture for a terrorist identification decision support system [C] // Proceedings of 19th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium. Alexan- dria, VA: CCRP, 2014. Paper 066.
  • 6Marques H C, Oliveira J M, Costa P C. COA modelling with probabilistic ontologies [EB/OL]. [2015-10-03]. http://ceur- ws.org/Vol-808/STIDS201 l_CR_T8_MarquesEtAl.pdf.
  • 7Ackoff, R L. From data to wisdom [J]. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 1989, 15 (8):3-9.
  • 8Rowley J. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy [J]. Journal of Information Science, 2007, 33 (2): 163-180.
  • 9C4ISR Architectures Working Group. Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI) [EB/OL]. [2015-09-23]. http://www,eng.auburn.edu/~hamilton/security/DODAF/ LISI.pdf.
  • 10Gupton K, Abbott J, Blais C, et al. Management of C4I and M&S data standards with modular OWL ontologies [C]// Proceedings of the Spring Simulation Interoperability Work- shop 2011. Boston, MA~ USA: IEEE/SISO, 2011: 404-417.

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部