期刊文献+

试论连体婴儿分离手术伦理审查标准

Ethical Review Standards of Separation Surgery for Conjoined Twins
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结合连体婴儿分离术伦理审查实例,将分离手术从伦理角度分为拯救生命和改善生命质量两种,前者要及时进行分离,后者则要在安全性的前提下择期进行分离。安全性评估的重要参考因素包括连体婴儿的类型、分离难度、不良后果与生命质量改善之间的利弊权衡以及既往病例报道。牺牲性分离要符合"救治无效、寄生型连体和危及生命"的伦理原则。分离手术审查还应涉及技术保障到位、知情同意、授权医生选择和处置、隐私保护等内容,以期适应分离手术的特殊性和复杂性,保障其合法性。 The ethical review on a clinical case of separation surgery for conjoined twins was analyzed, through which the separation surgery was divided into two categories from ethical perspective. Comparing to save life surgery needed to be performed in time, the other kind of selective operation on the condition of patients' safety is aiming to improve the quality of life. The main indicators of safety assessment include the type of conjoined twins, the difficulty of the separation surgery, evaluation of trade-offs.between adverse effects and the improvement of life quality, as well as the previous case reports. Save life separation surgery should be performed in accordance with the principles of "invalid treatment, parasitic twins and threat to life". Moreover, the review should also take technical support, informed consent, power of attorney and confidentiality into consideration, so that the legal requirements can be reached according to different kinds of separation surgery with specialty and complexity.
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 北大核心 2015年第11期24-26,41,共4页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
关键词 连体婴儿 分离术 伦理审查标准 conjoined twins, separation surgery, ethical review standards
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献27

  • 1杨立新.论人格利益准共有[J].法学杂志,2004,25(6):12-15. 被引量:18
  • 2杨立新,张莉.连体人的法律人格及其权利冲突协调[J].法学研究,2005,27(5):27-40. 被引量:24
  • 3陈东,欧光乾,杨述根,傅嘉庆,张义质,韩福刚,唐光才,胡鹏,黄占文.医学影像学在诊断先天性联体畸形中的价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2006,17(11):629-632. 被引量:2
  • 4余亚雄 李衷初 宋连城 等.剑突-脐联体双胎分离术[J].上海医学,1982,5(12):706-706.
  • 5[2]Jeffrey P.Kahn.A modern Solomon's baby?[J/OL].[2000-09-18]http://archives.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/09/18/ethics.matters/index.html.
  • 6孙效智.苏菲的选择-分割连体婴的伦理难题[J].哲学与文化,2001,(5):406-439.
  • 7[4]Alice Dreger.Why Change the Rules For Twins Like Them?[J/OL].Washington Post.September 24,2000;Page B02
  • 8[5]徐冰川.连体姐妹生死抉择[N].北京青年报,2000-09-27
  • 9[6]John Fitzpatrick.Jodie and Mary:whose choice was it anyway?[J/OL].(2001-06-19).http://www.spiked-online.com/Articles/00000000540E.htm.
  • 10[10]马俊驹,申海恩.人格权保护的理论体系与立法模式[C]//福州:海峡法学论坛论文集.2006:359-369.

共引文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部