期刊文献+

近端胃切除与全胃切除对SiewertⅡ型和Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌疗效的比较 被引量:4

A comparison study of total gastrectomy versus proximal gastrectomy for Siewert Ⅱ and Ⅲ adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对比研究全胃切除术和近端胃切除术治疗SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌(AEG)的疗效。方法回顾性分析2007年12月至2009年12月徐州医学院附属淮安医院普外科收治的105例SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型AEG患者的临床资料,其中近端胃切除术组(PG组)32例,全胃切除术组(TG组)73例。分析比较两组患者临床病理特征、围术期情况、胃食管反流情况、生命质量及生存情况。患者采用电话或者门诊复查方式进行随访。随访时间截止2014年12月。结果 PG组患者平均手术时间为(2.35±0.05)h,短于TG组的(3.17±0.04)h,平均术中出血(183.6±8.74)ml,少于TG组的(256.2±10.41)ml(P<0.05)。两组患者围术期并发症和术后住院时间的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TG组和PG组术后1年胃食管反流病问卷(GERD-Q)评分分别为(8.18±2.3)分和(12.59±2.40)分,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者在术后1年的BMI、血红蛋白、白蛋白指标差异无明显统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后5年生存率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根治性全胃、近端胃切除术两组5年生存率差异无统计学意义。近端胃切除并不能改善患者的营养状态,全胃切除在降低胃食管反流方面优于近端胃切除,是目前SiewertⅡ、Ⅲ型AEG患者较为合适的手术方式。 ObjectiveTo compare the effect of total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) for SiewertⅡ,Ⅲ type adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Methods The clinical data of 105 patients of SiewertⅡ andⅢ type AEG from December 2007 to December 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. All the patients were divided into the TG group (73 cases) and the PG group (32 cases). The clinicopathological features, perioperative, gastroesophageal reflux, quality of life and survival were compared between the two groups. Patients were followed up by telephone or out-patient examination till December 2014.Results The average operation time was (2.35±0.05) h in PG group, shorter than the TG group (3.17±0.04) h. The average intraoperative bleeding was (183.6±8.74) ml in PG group, less than the TG group (256.2±10.41) ml (P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in post operation complications and hospital stay of the two groups (P〉0.05). The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) scores at postoperative 1 year of TG group and PG group were (8.18±2.3) scores and (12.59±2.40) scores, with significant difference between the two groups (P〈0.05). There were no significant differences in BMI, hemoglobin, albumin at postoperative 1 year and postoperative 5 years survival rate of the two groups (P〉0.05).ConclusionThere was no significant difference in the 5-year survival rates between the two groups. Proximal gastrectomy did not improve the nutritional status of patients. Total gastrectomy in reducing gastroesophageal reflux is better than that of proximal gastrectomy, is currently suitable operation mode of the SiewertⅡ,Ⅲ AEG patients.
出处 《中华临床医师杂志(电子版)》 CAS 2015年第19期18-21,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinicians(Electronic Edition)
关键词 食管胃接合处 腺癌 近端胃切除 全胃切除 疗效 Esophagogastric junction Adenocarcinoma Proximal gastrectomy Total gastrectomy Efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献31

  • 1黄昌明,张祥福,卢辉山,张建中,吴心愿,官国先,王川.全胃切除术治疗胃底贲门癌的远期疗效[J].中华外科杂志,2003,41(10):729-732. 被引量:63
  • 2石铮,何庆良,翁山耕,陈有挺,林永堃.贲门癌不同术式的前瞻性随机临床研究[J].中华普通外科杂志,2004,19(12):728-731. 被引量:4
  • 3张祥福,卢辉山,殷凤峙,冯玉满,吴天金,郑知文,吴心愿,官国先,黄昌明,王川.贲门腺癌行全胃切除术与近侧胃大部切除术的疗效对比[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1994,16(6):447-449. 被引量:17
  • 4周予民,潘炯,盛宇伟,刘浩,范自平.近端胃切除术和全胃切除术治疗贲门癌[J].中国癌症杂志,2006,16(8):662-663. 被引量:9
  • 5Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer,1998;83(10) :2049-2053.
  • 6Fan YJ, Song X, Li JL, et al. Esophageal and gastric eardia cancers on 4238 Chinese patients residing in municipal and rural regions~ a histopathological comparison during 24-year period. World J Surg,2008;32(9) :1980-1988.
  • 7Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: incidence, characteristics, and strategies. Gastric Cancer,2010;13(2) :63-?3.
  • 8Carboni F, Lorusso R, Santoro R, et al. Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the role of abdominal-transhiatal resection. Ann Surg Oncol,2009;16(2):304-310.
  • 9Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL, et al. The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology, 1996 ; 111 ( 1 ) : 85-92.
  • 10Gaca JG, Petersen RP, Peterson BL, et al. Pathologic nodal status predicts disease-free survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2006 ; 13 ( 3 ) : 340-346.

共引文献37

同被引文献24

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部