期刊文献+

论艺术公共自由 被引量:4

Public Freedom of Art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 按中外传统,艺术自由的重要性在于艺术家的想象力的自由游戏,由此而产生的艺术可以让人们体验到人生中最宝贵的自由感。中国现代艺术界的艺术自由观诚然以艺术家自由创作为核心,但又往往服从于民族国家的整体权益。当今艺术自由应是跨越传统的艺术家自由和新兴的公众自由之上并加以涵摄的第三种艺术自由即艺术公共自由,其实质在于艺术家与公众之间的艺术共同自由。艺术自由及其社会基础是马克思主义美学和艺术理论传统的组成部分。面对艺术公共自由时应继续从上述传统获取资源。中国人眼中的艺术自由不同于西方宗教那种超越于现实人生之上的无拘束状态,而是主体面对现实状况而自觉实施的内心超越行为。艺术公共自由应突破艺术家与公众之间的对峙而寻求跨越两者之间的一种共同的公民自由及平等境界,其要素为合法、尚俗、循规、依仁、触境和游艺,其实现途径为由低到高的四层次构架,即自然境界、功利境界、道德境界和天地境界的心赏之自由。艺术公共自由的核心在于以艺术活动为依托的公心涵育的进行。公心涵育是公民的公正之心、共同之心的自觉修养及其成熟状况,拥有这种素养的公民才更有可能享受真正的艺术公共自由。艺术公共自由的目标由从低到高的五级台阶组成,即美己拒人、美己远人、美己近人、美己美人和美美异和。 According to tradition of China and foreign countries, the significance of art freedom lies in the free games of artists'imagination. Art generated from such free imagination could let readers or audiences experience the sense of freedom which is the most precious thing in life. In modern Chinese art circle, the freedom overview of art is certainly centered with artists' free creation, and yet at the same time it always is submitted to the overall rights and interests of nation and country. As regards to freedom of contemporary art is supposed to be the third freedom that transcends and include traditional freedom and newly -rising public freedom. In essence, it is a freedom mutually enjoyed by artists and the public. Art freedom and its social basis is the traditional composite of Marxism aesthetics and art theory. Con- fronting art public freedom, we should continue to achieve resource from the above - mentioned tradition. Art freedom in Chinese people's eyes is different from an unrestrained state transcending reality living publicized by western reli- gion. However, it stresses the inner transcendence behavior consciously implementing when the subject confronts practical situation. Art public freedom should break through the conflict between artists and the public, but should seek a mutual civilian freedom and equality transcending that conflict. And this includes legality, advocating custom, adhering to the law and regulations, taking benevolence as the norm, and indulging oneself in arts. The actualizing means could be categorized into four layers: natural idea realm, utility idea realm, moral idea realm, and idea realm of heaven and earth. The art public freedom mainly lies in the public spirit cultivation derived from art activities. Public spirit cultivation is the conscious culturing and its mature condition of the civilians'justice and heart of com- mon. Only those civilians who have such cultivation could possibly enjoy the true art public freedom. And the ultimate goal of art public freedom lies in the harmony of different beauties.
作者 王一川
出处 《艺术百家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期48-69,共22页 Hundred Schools In Arts
关键词 艺术学理论 艺术自由 艺术公共自由 内心超越行为 公心涵育 美美异和 Freedom of Art Public Freedom of Art Inner Transcendence Behavior Cultivation of Public Spirit Harmony of Different Beauties
  • 相关文献

参考文献44

  • 1http://weibo.corrt/p/1035051774978073/weibo?from.page一103505一home&wvr=5.1&mod=weibo—more#一loginLayer_1406813821605.
  • 2[美]马斯洛著,许金声等译《动机与人格(第三版)》,许金声《译者前言:关于马斯洛的需要层次论》,中国人民大学出版社,2007年版,第5页.
  • 3《中国现代性体验的发生》,北京师范大学出版社,2001年版.
  • 4王峰.影评人评《私人订制》:世上竟有这样没有羞耻的电影[EB/OL].中新网,http://www.hi.chinanews.com/hn·new/2013—12—20/331780.html.
  • 5《私人订制》这是一部好作业吗?[N].新京报,2013-12-19.
  • 6[英]阿巴拉斯特著.西方自由主义的兴衰(上册)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,2011.71.
  • 7[意]卡特著,刘训练译.自由的概念[A].后柏林的自由观[C].南京:江苏人民出版社,2007.3-22.
  • 8[美]罗尔斯著.正义论[M].何怀宏译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988.3.
  • 9梁启超.致南海夫子大人书(1900年4月29日)[A].丁文江、赵丰田.梁启超年谱长编[C].上海:上海人民出版社,1983.235.
  • 10[德]康德著,邓晓芒译.判断力批判[M].北京:人民出版社.2004.

二级参考文献16

  • 1蔡元培.《致(公言报)函并答林琴南函》,载《公言报》1919年4月1日.
  • 2《蔡元培全集》第3卷,杭州.浙江教育出版社1997年版,第576页.
  • 3Isaiah Berlin, "Two Concepts of Liberty," in Isaiah Berlin, The Proper Study of Mankind, Henry Hardy & Roger Hausheer (eds.), New York. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 1998, pp. 191-242.
  • 4Lin Yu-sheng, "Introduction to Benjamin I. Schwartz' 'China and Contemporary Millenarianism-Something New under the Sun' " and Benjamin I. Schwartz, "China and Contemporary Millenarianism-Something New under the Sun," Philosophy East and West, Vol. 51, No. 2 (April 2001), pp. 189-196.
  • 5史华慈,林毓生(著),林同奇,刘唐芬(译).《中国与当今千禧年主义-太阳底下的一桩新鲜事》,载郑培凯(主编).《九州学林》2003年冬季l卷2期,第258-271页.
  • 6王元化.《世界不再令人着迷-关于文明的物质化、庸俗化与异化的通信》,载王元化.《沉思与反思》,上海.辞书出版社2007年版,第65-71页.
  • 7Amartya Sen, "Foreword," in Michael Polanyi, The Tacit Dimension, Chicago . University of Chicago Press, 2009, pp. vii-xvi.
  • 8Michael Polanyi, "Foundations of Academic Freedom," in Michael Polanyi, The Logic of Liberty, London. Rout- ledge and Kegan Paul, 1951, pp. 32-48; Indianapolis. Liberty Fund, 1998, pp. 39-58.
  • 9Michael Polanyi, "Foundations of Academic Freedom," in Michael Polanyi, The Logic of Liberty, London. Rout- ledge and Kegan Paul, 1951, pp. 32-48; Indianapolis. Liberty Fund, 1998, ,p. 33.
  • 10Michael Polanyi, "Foundations of Academic Freedom," in Michael Polanyi, The Logic of Liberty, London. Rout- ledge and Kegan Paul, 1951, pp. 32-48; Indianapolis. Liberty Fund, 1998, p41.

共引文献354

同被引文献147

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部