摘要
目的 探讨内置于智能型无创呼吸机内的高级呼吸事件自动探测装置(AED)在睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(SAHS)患者无创正压通气(CPAP)治疗中的应用价值.方法 收集2013年1-8月于北京大学人民医院睡眠中心确诊的SAHS患者28例,其中男26例,女2例;年龄36~79岁,平均(51.9±14.6)岁.分别进行整夜CPAP治疗,同时进行整夜多导睡眠呼吸监测(PSG),比较PSG得出的呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)、呼吸暂停指数(AI)和低通气指数(HI)和AED自动评分得出的AHI、AI和HI,分析AED能否有效评价无创呼吸机治疗过程中AHI、AI和H1的变化.结果 两种方法得到的AHI分别为(6.1±5.6)和(7.1±5.3)次/h(P >0.05),AI分别为(5.4±5.4)和(4.6±4.2)次/h(P>0.05),HI分别为(0.77±1.07)和(2.54±1.98)次/h(P <0.05);Spearman相关系数相关分析结果显示AHI相关系数为0.698(P <0.01),AI相关系数为0.767(P <0.01),HI相关系数为0.141(P>0.05);Bland-Altman一致性检验结果显示两种方法得到的残余AHI指数具有较高的一致性.结论 高级呼吸事件自动探测装置(AED)对于SAHS患者智能型CPAP治疗中AHI和AI的评估相关性较好,但对于HI的监测准确性不佳,使用AED技术评估家庭智能型CPAP治疗效果具有一定的临床参考价值.
Objective To validate the use of the event detection capabilities in an auto-CPAP system used by patients with sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(SAHS).Methods A total of 28 subjects with SAHS were recruited in the study.All the underwent tests of polysomnography(PSG) before and during treatment by an-auto-CPAP system with advanced event detection (AED)in the sleep lab.Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI),apnea index (AI) and hypopnea index (HI) by PSG and PAP machine were compared.Results The mean AHI derived from PSG and AED was (6.1 ±5.6) and (7.1 ±5.3) times/h(P 〉0.05),AI was (5.4 ± 5.4) and (4.6 ± 4.2) times/h (P 〉 0.05),HI was (0.77 ± 1.07) and (2.54 ± 1.98) times/h (P 〈 0.05).The Spearman correlation coefficient of AHI was 0.698 (P 〈 0.05),AI was 0.767 (P 〈 0.05),HI was 0.141 (P 〉 0.05).Bland-Altman plot also showed a high agreement between AHI derived from PSG and AHI derived from AED.Conclusion AED showed a high agreement with PSG in the detection of AHI and AI,but not in HI.This technique may be helpful to monitor the efficacy of PAP treatment at home for long-term follow-up.
出处
《中华结核和呼吸杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2015年第11期844-847,共4页
Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases
基金
国家科技计划项目(2014DF31500)