期刊文献+

基于数据包络的松拉刀机构故障模式风险分析 被引量:2

Risk Analysis of Failure Mode of Clamping and Releasing Tool Based on Data Envelopment Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对风险优先数分析法中各评价指标权重相同,且对相同风险优先数(RPN)无法进行风险排序的问题,将数据包络法和风险优先数分析法进行融合,对松拉刀机构的故障模式进行风险分析.该方法能够增加RPN分析的区别力,客观寻找故障模式排序方法,确定松拉刀机构各故障模式的风险等级,有利于设计人员优先处理最危险的故障,为实现功能部件可靠性分配以及提高松拉刀机构的可靠性提供依据. In the risk priority number ( RPN) analysis , each evaluation index weight is the same , and it is impossi-ble to conduct risk ranking for the same RPN value .In view of the above issues , the data envelopment analysis ( DEA) and the risk priority number analysis are combined to analyze the failure mode risks of clamping and relea-sing tools.This method can increase the distinction of RPN , objectively search the failure mode ranking method and determine the risk grades of various failure modes of clamping and releasing tools .Therefore , it is beneficial for the designer to preferentially handle the most dangerous failure mode and can provide a basis for realizing the reliability allocation of function parts and improving the reliability of clamping and releasing tools .
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第7期142-146,共5页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家科技重大专项(2010ZX04014-011) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51275205) 吉林省科技发展计划项目(20140520126JH 20125008)~~
关键词 松拉刀机构 故障风险分析 数据包络分析 clamping and releasing tool failure risk analysis data envelopment analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Chang Kuei-Hu. Evaluate the orderings of risk for failure problems using a more general RPN methodology [ J ]. Mi- croelectronics Reliability ,2009,49 (12) : 1586-1596.
  • 2Wang Ying-Ming, Chin Kwai-Sang, Kwai Poon Gary Ka, et al. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis u- sing fuzzy weighted geometric mean [J]. Expert Systems with Applications ,2009,36 (2) : 1195-1207.
  • 3Xiao Ningcong, Huang Hongzhong, Li Yanfeng, et al. Mul- tiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA [ J ]. Engineering Failure A- nalysis, 2011,18 (4) : 1162-1170.
  • 4王晓峰,申桂香,张英芝,陈炳锟,郑珊,刘葳.可靠性模型参数估计方法的对比[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(6):47-52. 被引量:6
  • 5Kutlu Ahmet Can, Ekmekioglu Mehmet. Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP [ J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2012, 39( 1 ) :61-67.
  • 6陈政平,付桂翠,赵幼虎.改进的风险优先数(RPN)分析方法[J].北京航空航天大学学报,2011,37(11):1395-1399. 被引量:43
  • 7王贵宝,黄洪钟,张小玲.风险可能数——一种基于最大信息熵理论的风险度量和风险排序新方法[J].航空学报,2009,30(9):1683-1690. 被引量:24
  • 8王晓峰,申桂香,张英芝,陈炳锟,李怀洋.基于群体决策和多种赋值方式的加工中心关键部件RPN分析[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2011,41(6):1630-1635. 被引量:12
  • 9Helvacioglu Sebnem, Ozen Emre. Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design [ J ]. Ocean Engineering ,2014,79 : 131-141.
  • 10Liu Hu-Chen, Liu Long, Bian Qi-Hao, et al. Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning ap- proach and grey theory [ J ]. Expert Systems with Appli-cations ,2011,38 (4) :4403-4415.

二级参考文献41

共引文献64

同被引文献23

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部