期刊文献+

特定学习障碍评估模式综述 被引量:2

A Review of Assessment Model of Specific Learning Disabilities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 特定学习障碍评估模式的研究在近三十年得到较快的发展,形成了以差异模式、干预反应模式和认知优劣势模式为代表的三种基本的评估模式。本研究对这三种评估模式的定义、鉴定标准及特点进行综述,分析了各自的特点和缺陷并简要论述特定学习障碍评估方法的发展对我国学习障碍研究和干预的指导意义。 The study on specific learning disability assessment has been developing rapidly in the past 30 years, forming three basic assessment models represented by discrepancy model, response to intervention and pattern of strengths and weaknesses. The pa- persummarizes the definition, identifying standards and characteristic of the three assessment modelsas well as its characteristics and limitations. Then the paper briefly illustrates the development of specific learning disability and its guiding significance for the research and intervention of specific learning disabilities in China.
出处 《现代特殊教育》 2015年第12期20-25,共6页 Modern Special Education
基金 济南大学科研基金项目"学习障碍儿童学业情绪及其归因研究"(项目号:X1344)的阶段成果
关键词 特定学习障碍 评估模式差异模式 干预反应模式 认知优劣势模式 specific learning disability identification model discrepancy model response to intervention pattern of strengths and weaknesses
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Bateman, B. An educator' s view of a diagnostic approach to learning disorders[J]. In J. Hellmuth (Ed.) , Learning disorders. Seattle, WA : Special Child Populations, 1965,1 : 217 - 239.
  • 2Mather N, Healey W C. Deposing aptitude -achievement discrepancy as the imperial criterion for learning disabilities[J]. Learning Disabilities : A Muhidisciplinary Journal, 1990,1 :40 - 48.
  • 3Torgeson J K, Alexander A W, et al. Intensive remedial in- struction for children with severe reading disabilities: Imme- diate and long - term outcomes from two instructional ap- proaches [J]. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2001,34 : 33 -58.
  • 4Stuebing K K, Fletcher J M, et al. Validity of IQ -discrep- ancy classification of reading disabilities : A meta - analysis [J]. American Educational Research Journal,2002,39:469 -518.
  • 5Fuehs L S, Fuchs D. Treatment validity : a unifying concept for re - conceptualizing identification of learning disabilities [J].Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 1998,13 : 204 - 219.
  • 6Kavale K A, Holdnaek J A, et al. Responsiveness to inter- vention and the identification of specific learning disability : a critique and alternative proposal [J]. Learning Disability Quarterly ,2005,28:2 - 16.
  • 7杨希洁,韦小满.为全体学生提供有效的教育服务——“干预反应”模式的发展及影响[J].中国特殊教育,2012(6):3-10. 被引量:7
  • 8Gresham F M. Response to intervention: an alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed [J]. Education and Treatment of Children,2005 (4) : 328 - 34.
  • 9NCRTI. ImplementingRT1. http://www, rti4success, org/ [N]. Howtoimplementrtilanding, 2011 - 08 - 15.
  • 10袁琳.伍德科克-约翰逊认知能力测验修订版简介[J].重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛),2005,15(B09):219-220. 被引量:2

二级参考文献46

  • 1Griglths Amy - Jane, Parson B I~rien, Bums Mat- thew K, et al. Response to intervention research for practice. Alexandria: National Association of State Di- rectors of Special Education, Inc, 2007.1.
  • 2Gresham M F. Responsiveness to intervention: an alternative approach to the identification of learning dis- abifities. In: I_earning disabilities summit: building a foundation for the future white papers (2001). http:// www. nrcld, org/resources/ldsunmait/gresham, html, 2011 - 08-06.
  • 3Griffiths Amy - Jane, Parson B Lorien, BumsMatthew K, et al. Response to intervention research for practice. Alexandria: National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc, 2007.1.
  • 4Scull Janie, Winkler M Amber. Shifting trends in spe- cial education ( 2011 ). In: Fordham institute paper. http://www, edexcellence, net/publications - issues/ publications/shifting- trends- in- special, html, 2011 - 08 - 02.
  • 5Westat and Abt Associates. Design of the national as- sessment of progress under the Individuals with Disabil- ities Education Improvement Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2007. http://ies, ed. gov/ncee/ edlabs, 2011 - 08 - 04.
  • 6Harr- Robins J J, Shambaugh L S, Parrish T. The sta- tus of state- level response to intervention policies and procedures in the West Region states and five other states (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009 - No. 077). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Educa- tion, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Re- gional Educational Laboratory West, 2009. http://ies. ed. gov/ncee/edlabs, 2011 - 08 - 04.
  • 7Bocala C, Mello D, Reedy K, et al. Features of state response to intervention initiatives in Northeast and Is- lands Region states (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009- No. 083). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assis- tance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northeast and Islands, 2009. http://ies, ed. gov/ncee/edlabs, 2011 - 08 - 04.
  • 8Detgen A, Yamashita M, Davis B, et al. State policies and procedures on response to intervention in the Mid- west Region. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011 - No. 116). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Ed- ucation, Institute of Education Sciences, National Cen- ter for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Midwes, 2011. Re- trieved from http://ies, ed. gov/ncee/edlabs, 2011 - 08 -01.
  • 9NCR1T. About the national center on response to intervention, http : / / www . rti4success . org/ aboutus , 2011 - 08 - 08.
  • 10NASDSE. Response to intervention (RtI) project, http:// www. nasdse, org/Projects/Responseto Intervention RtI- Project/tabid/411/Default. aspx,2011 - 08 - 12.

共引文献33

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部