期刊文献+

Effect of Surface Topography on Stress Concentration Factor 被引量:1

Effect of Surface Topography on Stress Concentration Factor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Neuber rule and Arola-Ramulu model are widely used to predict the stress concentration factor of rough specimens. However, the height parameters and effective valley radius used in these two models depend strongly on the resolution of the roughness-measuring instruments and are easily introduce measuring errors. Besides, it is difficult to find a suitable parameter to characterize surface topography to quantitatively describe its effect on stress concentration factor. In order to overcome these disadvantages, profile moments are carried out to characterize surface topography, surface topography is simulated by superposing series of cosine components, the stress concentration factors of different micro cosine-shaped surface topographies are investigated by finite element analysis. In terms of micro cosine-shaped surface topography, an equation using the second profile moment to estimate the stress concentration factor is proposed, predictions for the stress concentration factor using the proposed expression are within 10% error compared with the results of finite element analysis, which are more accurate than other models. Moreover, the proposed equation is applied to the real surface topography machined by turning. Predictions for the stress concentration factor using the proposed expression are within 10% of the maximum stress concentration factors and about 5% of the effective stress concentration factors estimated from the finite element analysis for three levels of turning surface topographies under different simulated scales. The proposed model is feasible in predicting the stress concentration factors of real machined surface topographies. Neuber rule and Arola-Ramulu model are widely used to predict the stress concentration factor of rough specimens. However, the height parameters and effective valley radius used in these two models depend strongly on the resolution of the roughness-measuring instruments and are easily introduce measuring errors. Besides, it is difficult to find a suitable parameter to characterize surface topography to quantitatively describe its effect on stress concentration factor. In order to overcome these disadvantages, profile moments are carried out to characterize surface topography, surface topography is simulated by superposing series of cosine components, the stress concentration factors of different micro cosine-shaped surface topographies are investigated by finite element analysis. In terms of micro cosine-shaped surface topography, an equation using the second profile moment to estimate the stress concentration factor is proposed, predictions for the stress concentration factor using the proposed expression are within 10% error compared with the results of finite element analysis, which are more accurate than other models. Moreover, the proposed equation is applied to the real surface topography machined by turning. Predictions for the stress concentration factor using the proposed expression are within 10% of the maximum stress concentration factors and about 5% of the effective stress concentration factors estimated from the finite element analysis for three levels of turning surface topographies under different simulated scales. The proposed model is feasible in predicting the stress concentration factors of real machined surface topographies.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第6期1141-1148,共8页 中国机械工程学报(英文版)
基金 Supported by National Defense Preliminary Research Project of China(Grant No.104010205)
关键词 surface topography profile moments stress concentration factor finite element method surface topography,profile moments,stress concentration factor,finite element method
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1GRIFFITHS B. Manufacturing surface technology, surface integrity andfunctionalperformance[M]. London: Penton Press, 2001.
  • 2JUV1NALL R C. Engineering considerations of stress, strain and strength[M]. McGraw-Hill, 1967.
  • 3JUVINALL R C, MARSHEK K M. Fundamentals of machine component design[M]. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc., 1991.
  • 4MCKELVEY S A, FATEMI A. Surface finish effect on fatigue behavior of forged steel[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2012, 36: 130-145.
  • 5SURARATCHI M, LIMIDO J, MABRU C, et al. Modeling the influence of machined surface roughness on the fatigue life of aluminium alloy[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008, 30: 2119-2126.
  • 6ZAHAVI E, TORBILO V. Fatigue design: life expectancy of machineparts[M]. 1st ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1996.
  • 7ARDI D T, LI Y G, CHAN K H K, et al. The effects of machined topography on fatigue life of a nickel based superalloy[C]//2nd CIRP Conference on Surface Integrity(CSl), Nottingham, Britain, May 28-30, 2014, 13: 19-24.
  • 8AROLA D, WILLIAMS C L. Estimating the fatigue stress concentration factor of machined surfaces[J]. International Journal of Fatigue, 2002, 24: 923-930.
  • 9AONO Y, NOGUCHI H. Fatigue limit reliability of axisymmetric complex surface[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2005, 131 : 59-78.
  • 10NEUBER H. Kerbspannungslehre[M]. Berlin: Springer, 1958.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部