期刊文献+

公路桥梁长加载区间的多车道车辆荷载概念模型 被引量:8

Conceptual Traffic Load Model for Multi-lane Highway Bridges with Long Loading Length
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高速公路多车道荷载及其响应的差异一直是桥梁设计与研究关注的重点,目前的多车道荷载模型对这种差异表述不合理,特别是长加载区间效应.选取2009~2013年实测的2车道和4车道28d自由通行的WIM(Weigh-in-motion)数据,研究车辆的车道选择和荷载的空间分布特性,分析长加载区间的多车道荷载响应,提出了考虑多车道荷载模型的新思路,并校核了该概念模型的系数取值.研究表明,应选用至少3周以上数据进行车辆及荷载分析才具有统计意义,多车道中各分车道的车辆及荷载分布具有显著差异,我国规范基于车道荷载同分布的假定不成立.车道荷载分位值差别显著,而最大值却大致相同,说明多车道荷载模型无法兼顾不同加载区间的修正要求.长加载区间上分车道荷载响应之间的比值趋于稳定数量关系,表明各车道不仅不能达到相同水平极值,且不能同时达到.推荐的多车道概念模型能科学考虑长加载区间上分车道及总车道响应极值的关系,更具工程意义,校核的系数表明推荐模型合理可用. Differences in vehicle load and its response on multi-lane highway bridges were crucial to bridge design and related researches. These differences,especially the load effects with long loading length,were poorly illustrated by the current multi-lane traffic load models.The 28-day free flow weigh in motion(WIM)data on a two-lane highway and a four-lane highway were offered.The data were obtained from the year 2009 to 2013.Based on the data,characteristics in the vehicle lane selection and spatial load distribution were studied.Multi-lane load response with long loading length was analyzed.A new multi-lane load model was proposed,based on which model coefficients values were calibrated. The results suggest that statistical stability of the vehicle and load analysis can only be ensured with a data length over 3 weeks.Vehicle and load distribution in each lane was of significant difference,indicating that the equal distribution assumption of vehicle lane load in current Chinese code was in need of modification.Variation of the vehicle load was substantial while the maximum load values were of not much difference,which suggests that the current multi-lane load model can no longer satisfy the modification requirements raised by varied loading lengths.The load response ratios of different lanes with long loading length roughly remained as constants,indicating that extreme load responses in different lanes were different and would not appear simultaneously. The recommended conceptual multi-lane load model provided a reasonable and scientific elaboration on the relationship of extreme load responses among different lanes and all lanes with long loading length.The model proved to be reasonable and of more engineering application value by the coefficient calibration.
出处 《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1497-1502,共6页 Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基金 国家自然科学基金(51108338 51478337)
关键词 多车道 车辆荷载模型 横向折减系数 荷载空间分布 multi-lane traffic load model lateral reduction coefficient spatial load distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Garber N, Hoel L. Traffic and highway engineering [M]. Washington D C: Cengage Learning, 2014.
  • 2Barcel6 J. Models, traffic models, simulation, and traffic simulation [M]. New York: Springer, 2010.
  • 3Fu G, Liu L, Bowman M D. Multiple presence factor for truck load on highway bridges [J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2011, 18(3): 240.
  • 4Nowak A S. Live load model for highway bridges [J ]. Structural Safety, 1993,13(1) : 53.
  • 5Kulicki J M, Prucz Z, Clancy C M, et al. Updating the calibration report for AASHTO LRFD Code [R]. Washington D C: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, 2007.
  • 6Bakht B, Jaeger L G. Bridge evaluation for multipresence of vehicles[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990,116(3).- 603.
  • 7Bakht B, Jaeger L G. Simplified methods of bridge analysis for the third edition of OHBDC [J]. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 1992, 19 (4) : 551.
  • 8Buckland P G. Recommended design loads for bridges [J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1981, 107(7), 1161.
  • 9阮欣,周军勇,石雪飞.随机车流作用下多塔斜拉桥总体荷载响应特性[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(1):25-30. 被引量:12
  • 10Gindy M, Nassif H. Multiple presence statistics for bridge live load based on weigh-in-motion data [J]. Transportation Research Record, 2007, 2028:125.

二级参考文献17

  • 1Kishore A,Klashinsky R.Prevention of highway infrastructure damage through commercial vehicle weight enforcement[C/OL].Annual Indian Roads Congress (IRC) Session,Calcutta:Council of the Indian Roads Congress.2000.
  • 2RUAN Xin,ZHOU Xiaoyi,GUO Ji.Extreme value extrapolation for bridge vehicle load effect based on synthetic vehicle flow[J].Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2012,40(10):1458.
  • 3A Getachew.Traffic load effects on bridges:statistical analysis of collected and Monte Carlo simulated vehicle data[D].Structural Engineering of Royal Institute of Technology,2003.
  • 4China Highway Planning and Design Institute.JTG D60-2004General code for design of highway bridges and culverts[S].Beijing:China Communications Press,2004.
  • 5"公路桥梁车辆荷载研究"课题组.公路桥梁车辆荷载研究[R].北京:中交公路规划设计院,1997.
  • 6"Vehicle Loads Research for Highway Bridge" Research Group.Vehicle loads research for highway bridge[S].Beijing:China Highway Planning and Design Institute,1997.
  • 7European Committee for Standardisation,et al.EuroCodel (EN 1991-2:2003):Actions on Structwes — part2:traffic loads on bridges[S].[S.1.]:CEN,2003.
  • 8ZHENG Buquan,ZHANG shiduo.Probability computing method for middle and small span with multiple lane transverse reduction coefficient[J].Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong Institution,1992,11(4):17.
  • 9Chengming Lan,Hui Li,Jinping Ou.Traffic load modelling based on structural health monitoring data[J].Structure and Infrastructure Engineering.2011(5)
  • 10Terje Aven,Enrico Zio.Some considerations on the treatment of uncertainties in risk assessment for practical decision making[J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety.2010(1)

共引文献15

同被引文献59

引证文献8

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部