摘要
唐君毅、牟宗三、徐复观都注重对儒家经典的理解与诠释,并且在方法论上有一致性。他们批评了乾嘉学派解读经典的方法策略,亦注重客观理解的重要性,并突出诠释主体在诠释过程中的主动性、能动性,强调通过生命的体验,以诚、敬的姿态面对儒家经典并予以解读。此外,他们的经典诠释方法也多与西方诠释学的观点不谋而合。
Tang Junyi, Mou Zongsan and Xu Fuguan pay attention to the comprehension and interpretation of the Confucian classics and are consistent in methodology. They criticize the methods and strategies of reading classics taken by Qian Jia School and they lay stress on the importance of objective understanding, highlight the initiative of interpretative subject, and emphasize by the experience interpreting the Confucian classics with the attitude of sincerity and respect. In addition, their classical interpretation method coincides with many western hermeneutic ideas.
出处
《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2015年第5期90-95,共6页
Journal of Guangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金
河北省社会科学基金项目"先秦儒家德性伦理研究"(HB152X022)
河北省高等学校社科研究基金项目"20世纪孟子学研究"(SY14118)