期刊文献+

腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺癌的临床效果分析 被引量:42

Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术治疗高危前列腺癌的临床效果.方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2013年6月在南京医科大学第一附属医院泌尿外科行腹腔镜下根治手术治疗的65例高危前列腺癌患者临床资料.患者年龄45- 75岁,平均67岁;前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平11.2 -65.5 μg/L,平均26.7 μg/L.穿刺Gleason评分3+3分4例,3+4分27例,4+3分11例,4+4分21例,4+5分2例.骨扫描检查排除骨转移.患者在全身麻醉下行经腹腔径路腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术,切除前列腺后行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫.根据术后病理结果决定术后是否辅助放疗或内分泌治疗.术后门诊随访,1年内每1-2个月检测PSA值,每3个月评价尿控情况;1年后每2-3个月检测血PSA值.结果 手术平均时间(134±21) min,术中平均出血量(300±146) ml.术中膀胱颈重建15例,术后平均7d拔除尿管,平均4d拔除引流管.术后病理检查结果示病理分期为pT225例,pT3a 28例,pT3b 9例,pT4 3例;切缘阳性15例.淋巴结平均清扫19枚(11 -24枚),淋巴结转移患者11例,阳性淋巴结共19枚.术后拔除尿管后恢复正常排尿43例,术后3个月尿失禁5例,术后12个月尿失禁1例.11例患者术后行辅助内分泌治疗,19例患者行辅助放疗.术后随访12-30个月,平均20个月,5例患者随访期间出现生化复发.结论 腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术加扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗高危前列腺癌手术安全可行,手术可提供准确的分期分级情况,是高危前列腺癌综合治疗中重要的治疗方法. Objective To study the technique and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for high risk prostate cancer.Methods A total of 65 patients with high risk prostate cancer were treated with surgery in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2011 to June 2013.The mean age was 67 years (range 45-75 years).The mean preoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA) level was 26.7 μg/L(range 11.2-65.5 μg/L).The transrectal biopsy revealed Gleason score of 3 + 3 in 4 patients, Gleason 3 + 4 in 27 patients, Gleason 4 + 3 in 11 patients, Gleason 4 + 4 in 21 patients and Gleason 4 + 5 in 2 patients.The bone metastasis was excluded by scintigraphy examination.The surgical procedures were performed through transperitoneal approach.Extended pelvic lymph nodes dissection was performed after the removal of the prostate.Adjuvant radiotherapy or hormonal therapy was administrated according to the pathological results.Serum PSA was detected every 1 to 2 month and urinary continence was evaluated every 3 month in the first year, and then serum PSA was detected every 2 to 3 month.Results The mean operative time was (134 ± 21)minutes and the median blood loss was (300 ± 146) ml.Bladder neck reconstruction was performed in 15 cases.The drainage was removed on postoperative day 4 and the catheter was removed on day 7.Pathologic results demonstrated pT2 in 25 patients, pT3a in 28 patients, pT3b in 9 patients and pT4 in 3 patients.Positive surgical margin was presented in 15 patients.A median of 19 lymph nodes (range 11-24 nodes) were retrieved during lymphadenectomy and 11 patients had lymph nodes metastasis with a total of 19 positive nodes.Forty-three patients recovered continence after the removal of catheter.Eleven patients received adjuvant hormonal therapy and 19 patients received adjuvant radiation therapy.With the median of 20 months follow-up(range 12-30 months), 5 patients got biochemical recurrence.Conclusions Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with extended lymph nodes dissection for high risk prostate cancer is safe and technical feasible.It provides accurate information on tumor stage and grade.It is an important component of multimodality for the treatment of high risk prostate cancer.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第11期847-851,共5页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81201998)
关键词 前列腺肿瘤 腹腔镜检查 前列腺切除术 Prostatic neoplasms Laparoscopy Prostatectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer[ J]. JAMA, 1998,280( l I ) :969-974.
  • 2Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: Treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2014,65 ( 2 ) : 467-470.
  • 3赵峥,孟一森,何睿,张骞,李学松,谌诚,肖云翔,李昕,宋毅,周利群.经腹和腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的比较研究[J].中华外科杂志,2014,52(2):135-138. 被引量:7
  • 4Wiegel T, Bottke D, Steiner U, et al. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in p33 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96-02/ AUO AP 09/95 [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2009, 27 ( 18 ) :2924-2930.
  • 5Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3NOM0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial[ J]. J Urol,2009,181 (3) : 956-962.
  • 6Briganti A, Blute ML, Eastham JH, et al. Pelvie lymph node dissection in prostate cancer [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2009,55 ( 6 ) : 1251- 1265.
  • 7Engel J, Bastian PJ, Baur H, et al. Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive patients with prostate cancer [J]. Eur Urol,2010,57(5) :754-761.
  • 8Gakis G, Boorjian SA, Briganti A, et al. The role of radical prostatectomy and lymph node dissection in lymph node-positiveprostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Eur Uro1,2014,66 ( 2 ) : 191-199.
  • 9邵鹏飞,殷长军,孟小鑫,居小兵,吕强,李杰,秦超,张炜,顾民,华立新,徐正铨.改良经腹腔途径腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术的临床研究[J].中华外科杂志,2011,49(6):542-545. 被引量:6
  • 10邵鹏飞.对于局部进展性(T3a期)前列腺癌建议采用前列腺癌根治术[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2011,16(5):459-462. 被引量:2

二级参考文献28

  • 1叶定伟.前列腺癌的流行病学和中国的发病趋势[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(6):362-364. 被引量:168
  • 2刘定益,唐崎,王名伟,刘世雄,王健,周燕峰,吴瑜璇,周文龙,祝宇,张翀宇.前列腺癌患者根治术后尿失禁的预防[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(6):369-371. 被引量:19
  • 3ToshihiroSaito,YasuoKitamura,ShuichiKomatsubara,YasuoMatsumoto,TadashiSugita,Noboru Hara.Outcomes of locally advanced prostate cancer:a single institution study of 209 patients in Japan[J].Asian Journal of Andrology,2006,8(5):555-561. 被引量:8
  • 4Artibani W,Grosso G,Novara G,et al.Is laparoscopic radical prostatectomy better than traditional retropubic radical prostatectomy? An analysis of peri-operative morbidity in two contemporary series in Italy.Eur Urol,2003,44:401-406.
  • 5Karakiewicz PI,Eastham JA,Graefen M,et al.Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer;multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients.Urology,2005,66:1245-1250.
  • 6Orvieto MA,Alsikafi NF,Shalhav AL,et al.Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy.BJU Int,2006,98:1199-1203.
  • 7Coelho RF,Chauhan S,Orvieto MA,et al.Predictive factors for positive surgical margins and their locations after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol,2010,57,1022-1029.
  • 8Ficarra V,Novara G,Secco S,et al.Predictors of positive surgical margins after laparoscopic robot assisted radical prostatectomy.J Urol,2009,182:2682-2688.
  • 9Liss M,Osann K,Ornstein D.Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy:a contemporary analysis of risk factors.BJU Int,2008,102:603-608.
  • 10Porpiglia F,Fiori C,Grande S,et al.Selective versus standard ligature of the deep venous complex during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy:effects on continence,blood Loss,and margin status.Eur Urol,2009,55:1377-1383.

共引文献12

同被引文献306

引证文献42

二级引证文献167

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部