期刊文献+

基于最大一致集的合作运输联盟稳定性分析 被引量:6

ANALYSIS ON STABILITY OF COLLABORATIVE TRANSPORTATION COALITION WITH LARGEST CONSISTENT SET
原文传递
导出
摘要 随着油价的不断上涨以及运输市场的激烈竞争,承运人降低成本的压力不断增大.因此越来越多的承运人通过寻求与其他承运人(甚至竞争对手)进行合作运输来降低成本.文章考虑具有竞争行为的承运人之间的合作运输.首先从非合作博弈的角度分析了合作如何影响竞争的结果.然后重点利用合作博弈中最大一致集(largest consistent set,LCS)的概念分析了各种联盟结构的稳定性,讨论了承运人之间的替代率如何影响联盟的稳定形式.最后,通过数值算例分析了不同联盟结构下的社会福利情况. With the price of oil and the pressure of reducing cost increasing, more and more carriers seek to cooperate with other carriers to reduce cost. This paper studies collaboration among carriers in transportation market, taking into account competition among carriers as well. First, this paper discusses how collaboration affects competition outcomes among carriers from the perspective of non-cooperative game theory. Then, from the perspective of cooperative game theory, the concept of largest consistent set (LCS) theory is applied to analyze the stability of different coalition structures. Particularly, this paper focuses on how substitutability affects the stable coalition structure. Finally, a numerical example is presented to illustrate how different coalition structures affect social welfare. The results obtained in this paper not only provide some insights for carriers who need to make decisions about whether to form a coalition with other carriers, but also give the policy-makers some sense about how to regulate the transportation market so that social welfare will be optimized.
出处 《系统科学与数学》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第10期1219-1232,共14页 Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划(71090402) 国家自然科学基金(71271178) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(12YJA630057)资助课题
关键词 合作运输 竞争 非合作博弈 合作博弈 联盟稳定性 最大一致集. Collaborative transportation, competition, non-cooperative game, cooperative game, coalition stability, largest consistent set (LCS).
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Ozener O, Ergun O. Allocating costs in a collaborative transportation procurement network. Transportation Science, 2008, 42(2): 146-165.
  • 2Ergun O, Kuyzu G, Savelsbergh M. Reducing truckload transportation costs through collabora- tion. Transportation Science, 2007, 41(2): 206-221.
  • 3Ergun O, Kuyuzu G, Savelsbergh, M. Shipper collaboration. Computers & Operations Research, 2007, 34(6): 1551-1560.
  • 4Dai B, Chen H. A multi-agent and auction-based framework and approach for carrier collabora- tion. Logistics Research, 2011, 3(2-3): 101-120.
  • 5Dai B, Chen H. Profit allocation mechanisms for carrier collaboration in pickup and delivery service. Computers & Industrial En.qineerinq, 2012, 62(2): 633-643.
  • 6李军,蔡小强.易腐性产品运输设施选择博弈[J].管理科学学报,2009,12(1):28-37. 被引量:17
  • 7Chwe M S Y. Farsighted coalitional stability. Journal of Economic Theory, 1994, 63(2): 299-325.
  • 8Granot D, Sosic G. Formation of alliances in internet-based supply exchanges. Management Science, 2005, 51(1): 92-105.
  • 9Nagarajan M, Sosic G. Stable farsighted coalitions in competitive markets. Management Science, 2007, 53(1): 29-45.
  • 10Pfohl H, Buse H. Inter-organizational logistics systems in flexible production networks: An orga- nizational capabilities perspective. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 2000, 30(5): 388-412.

二级参考文献59

  • 1华中生,孙毅彪,李四杰.单周期产品需求不确定性对供应链合作的影响[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(5):40-48. 被引量:13
  • 2Raafat F. Survey of literature on continuously deteriorating inventory models [ J ]. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1991, 42( 1 ) : 27-37.
  • 3Nahmias S. Perishable inventory theory: A review[J]. Operations Research, 1982, 30(4) : 680-708.
  • 4Goyal S K, Giri B C. Recent trends in modeling of deteriorating inventory [ J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 134: 1-16.
  • 5Young H P. Cost allocation[ A]. In: Handbook of Game Theory, Volume 2 [ M ]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B. V., 1994. 1193-1235.
  • 6Young H P. Cost Allocation: Methods, Principles, Applications[M]. Amsterdam: Elseviers Science Publishers B. V., 1994.
  • 7Diaw K. Cost Allocation As A Coordination Mechanism[ R]. Working Paper, Tiburg: Center for Economic Research, Tiburg University, 2003.
  • 8Moulin H, Sprumont Y. Fair Allocation of Production Externalities: Recent Results[R]. Working Paper, Montreal: Department de Sciences Oconomiques, Universite de Montreal, 2005.
  • 9Tijs S H, Driessen T S H. Game theory and cost allocation problems[ J]. Management Science, 1986, 32: 1015-1028.
  • 10Straffin P D, Heaney J P. Game theory and the tennessee valley authority[ J ]. International Journal of Game Theory, 1981, 10 : 35-43.

共引文献35

同被引文献37

引证文献6

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部