摘要
从语义上看,"不符合食品安全标准"的辨识较为简单。但食品安全标准本身就属于一种开放性的技术标准或规范。故司法机关必须对其将欲援引的事项进行独立判断,突破"标准"的形式束缚,彰显"安全"的核心价值。一方面,即使某标准条款在名义上确实属于"食品安全标准",也应当进行独立评价,而不能简单地直接援引;另一方面,尽管某一具体规则没有在形式上被纳入"XX标准",但只要直接关乎"食品安全",可能损及"公众健康",也依然存在适用的余地。
From the perspective of semantics, the article of "non-conformity of food safety standards" poses no obstacle in application. But the food safety standard is an open technical standard or regulation. Therefore, the judicial authorities must make an independent judgment on the matters that they wish to invoke, break the formality constraints of the "standard" and highlight the core value of "security". On one hand, even if a standard term in the name is indeed the range of a "food safety standards", it should be independently evaluated; on the other hand, although a specific rule is not included in the form of some standard, but as long as it is directly related to food safety, there is still room for application.
出处
《重庆三峡学院学报》
2015年第6期74-79,共6页
Journal of Chongqing Three Gorges University
关键词
援引性责任条款
食品安全标准
目的解释
the citation of responsibility articles
food safety standards
purpose interpretation