期刊文献+

超声联合硬度评分系统在甲状腺微小结节诊断中的应用价值 被引量:12

The value of combined stiffness score system for the diagnosis of thyroid micronodules
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声联合硬度评定系统在甲状腺微小结节诊断中的应用价值。方法对30例行甲状腺切除手术患者的67个甲状腺微小结节,术前分别行实时弹性成像和声脉冲辐射力成像评定成像测定其硬度。在此基础上,以联合硬度评定系统对甲状腺结节硬度进行评定,以硬度为依据鉴别诊断甲状腺结节的良恶性,并以病理为标准,绘制ROC曲线。结果实时弹性成像鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性分别为58.8%、96.9%、95.2%、69.6%、77.6%。声脉冲辐射力成像鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性分别为76.4%、75.8%、76.4%、75.8%、76.1%。联合硬度评定系统鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值、准确性分别为91.2%、93.9%、93.9%、91.2%、92.5%。联合系统与实时弹性成像以及声脉冲辐射力成像相比,ROC曲线下面积分别为0.98,0.93和0.88(Z=8.72,P<0.05)。结论联合硬度评分系统有助于提高术前甲状腺微小结节良恶性鉴别诊断的准确性。 Objective To assess the value of combined stiffness score system(CSSS) in differential diagnosis of thyroid micronodules. Methods 30 patients with 67 thyroid nodules underwent real-time elastography(RTE) and acoustic radiation force impulse(ARFI) imaging before thyroidectomy, then CSSS were taken to re-evaluate the stiffness of the thyroid nodules. Compared with pathological findings, ROC curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy. Result The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) and accuracy of RTE for differential diagnosis were 58.8%, 96.9%, 95.2%, 69.6%, 77.6%, while for ARFI and CSSS they were 76.4%, 75.8%, 76.4%, 75.8%, 76.1%, and 91.2%, 93.9%, 93.9%, 91.2%, 92.5%. The areas under the ROC curve for CSSS, RTE and ARFI were 0.98, 0.93 and 0.88 respectively, there were significant differences(Z = 8.72, P 〈0.05). Conclusion CSSS was helpful in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid micronodules.
出处 《中华医学超声杂志(电子版)》 CSCD 2015年第10期768-772,共5页 Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound(Electronic Edition)
基金 上海市科委医学引导类科技项目(14411970400)
关键词 联合硬度评分系统 实时弹性成像 声脉冲辐射力 甲状腺微小结节 United stiffness score system Real-time elastography Acoustic radiation force impulse Thyroid micronodules
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Sun J, Cai J, Wang X. Real-time ultrasound elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(3):495-502.
  • 2Grazhdani H, Cantisani V, Lodise P, et al. Prospective evaluation of acoustic radiation force impulse technology in the differentiation of thyroid nodules: accuracy and interobserver Variability assessment [J]. J Ultrasound, 2014, 17(1):13-20.
  • 3陈福进,李秋梨,曾宗渊,宋明,杨安奎,张诠,陈艳峰,欧阳电.分化型甲状腺癌的多因素预后分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(1):104-108. 被引量:24
  • 4Sahin M,SenguiA,BerkiZ,et al. Ultrasound-guided fine-needieaspiration biopsy and uitrasonographic features of infracentimetric noduies in patients with noduiar goiter: correiation with pathoiogicai findings [J]. Endocr Pathoi, 2006, 17(1): 67-74.
  • 5Bo YH, Ahn HY, Lee YH, et al. Maiignancy ratein zoographically suspicious thyroid noduies of less than a centimeter in size does not decrease with decreasin size [J]. J Korean Med Sic, 2011, 26(2): 237-242.
  • 6Zhang YF, Xu HX, He Y, et al. Virtual touch tissue quantification of acoustic radiation force impulse: A new ultrasound elastic imaging in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e49094.
  • 7Deng J, Zhou P, Tian SM, et al. Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, and their combined use in differentiating focal solid thyroid nodules [J]. PLoS One, 2014, 9(3):e90674.
  • 8张一峰,何勇,徐辉雄,徐军妹,刘畅,郭乐杭,刘琳娜.声脉冲辐射力弹性成像诊断甲状腺微小癌的价值[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(23):7615-7619. 被引量:29
  • 9Wang Y, Dan HJ, Dan HY, et al. Differential diagnosis of small single solid thyroid nodules using real-time ultrasound elastography [J]. J. Int. Med. Res, 2010, 38(2): 466-472.
  • 10Bojunga J, Dauth N, Berner C, Meyer G, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging for differentiation of thyroid nodules [J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(8): e42735.

二级参考文献25

  • 1陈福进,李秋梨,曾宗渊,宋明,杨安奎,张诠.分化型甲状腺癌的治疗及影响复发的因素分析[J].癌症,2004,23(11):1311-1316. 被引量:50
  • 2魏芳,彭娴婧,许俊,鲍晓峰.甲状腺微小癌的高频超声诊断[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2005,20(3):234-236. 被引量:23
  • 3陈福进,李秋梨,曾宗渊,宋明,杨安奎,张诠,陈艳峰,欧阳电.分化型甲状腺癌的多因素预后分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2006,27(1):104-108. 被引量:24
  • 4牛丽娟,郝玉芝,周纯武.超声诊断甲状腺占位性病变的价值[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(6):415-418. 被引量:117
  • 5HUNDAHL S A,FLEMING I D,FREMGEN A M,et al.A national cancer data base report on 53856 cases of thyroid carcinoma treated in the U.S,1985-1995[J].Cancer,1998,83(12):2638-2648.
  • 6HOLZER S,REINERS C,MANN K,et al.Patterns of care for patients with primary differentiated carcinoma of the thyroid gland treated in Germany during 1996[J].Cancer,2000,89(1):192-201.
  • 7BRIERLY J D,PANZARELLA T,TSANG R W,et al.A comparison of different staging systems predictability of patient outcome[J].Cancer,1997,79(12):2414-2423.
  • 8KINDER B K.Well differentiated thyroid cancer[J].Curr Opin Oncol,2003,15(1):71-77.
  • 9CADY B,ROSSI R.An expanded view of risk-group definition in differentiated thyroid carcinoma[J].Surgery,1988,104(6):947-953.
  • 10HAY I D,GRANT C S,TAYLOR W f,et al.Ipsilateral lobectomy versus bilateral lobar resection in papillary thyroid carcinoma:A retrospective analysis of surgical outcome using a novel prognostic scoring system[J].Surgery,1987,102(6):1088-1095.

共引文献51

同被引文献99

引证文献12

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部