期刊文献+

不同高技术产业创新路径绩效比较研究——基于系统广义矩与分位数回归模型的估计

A Comparative Study of the Performance of the Different Channels of China's High-tech Industry Innovation——Based on the Assessment by Sys-GMM and Quantile Regression Models
下载PDF
导出
摘要 绩效是创新路径选择的重要依据,利用高技术产业省际面板数据,采用系统广义矩估计与分位数回归方法,研究企业自主研发、引进国外技术、引进国内技术、更新改造四种不同途径科技投入对创新产出的贡献。结果表明:企业自主研发投入贡献最大,引进国外技术投入次之,更新改造投入贡献最小。高技术企业自主研发投入与引进国外技术的结合较好。引进国内技术投入对最高科研产出水平地区的贡献比较显著,研发人员全时当量的贡献总体较低,并且随着科技产出的提高,其贡献越来越低,说明高科研产出地区研发人员的绩效较低。 Performance is an important gauge of the channels of innovation. Based on panel data of provincial high-tech industry, this paper analyzes the contributions of four channels of scientific and technological input to innovation output, namely, enterprises' self R&D input, the import of foreign technology, the introduction of domestic technologies and equipment upgrading and transformation by using Sys-GMM and Quantile Regression Models. The results show enterprises' self R&D input yields highest contribution, the import of foreign technology ranks the second, while equipment upgrading and transformation ranks the last. The combination of self R&D input with foreign technology importing yields better results in those enterprises with high technologies. The introduction of domestic technologies makes significant contribution in those areas with the highest level of scientific and technological output while the overall contribution of R&D staff is comparatively low and turns out to be worse with the increase of scientific and performance of R& D staff in those areas with high level of technological output, indicating comparatively poor scientific and technological output.
作者 俞立平
机构地区 宁波大学商学院
出处 《上海大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期83-92,共10页 Journal of Shanghai University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 宁波市与中国社会科学院合作共建城市经济研究中心预研项目(ZX2015000098)
关键词 高技术产业 自主研发 引进技术 更新改造 绩效 high-tech industry, enterprises' self R&D input, introducing technology, equipment upgrading and transformation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Kuen-hung Tsai. The R&D Performance inTaiwan Electronics Industry: a Longitudinal Examination [ J ]. R&D Management, 2004 (2) :179-189.
  • 2L W Mclean, D K Round. Research and Prod- uct Innovation in Australian Manafacturing In- dustries [ J ]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1978(1) :1-12.
  • 3B Billings, A Yaprak. Inventive Efficiency: How the U. S. Compares with Japan [ J ]. R&D Management, 1995 ( 4 ) : 365-376.
  • 4Martin Falk. R&D Spending in the High-tech Sector and Economic Growth [ J ]. Research in Economics ,2007 (3) : 140-147.
  • 5H Carpon, B Van Pottelberghe. Public Support to R&Dprogrammes: An Integrated Assessment Scheme [ R ]. Paris : OECD, 1997:3548.
  • 6Katharine Wakelin. Productivity Growth and R&D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms [ J ]. Research Policy,2001 (7) : 1079-1090.
  • 7U N Bulent. R&D Spillovers Through Trade in a Panel of OECD Industries [ J]. The Jurnal of International Trade & Economic Develop- ment, 2008 ( 1 ) : 105-155.
  • 8Lakshmi K Raut. R&D spillover and produc- tivity growth: Evidence from Indian private firms [ J ]. Journal of Development Econom- ics,1995 (1) :1-23.
  • 9王国顺,张涵,邓路.R&D存量、所有制结构与技术创新效率——高技术产业面板数据的实证研究[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,34(2):71-75. 被引量:16
  • 10沙文兵,李桂香.FDI知识溢出、自主R&D投入与内资高技术企业创新能力——基于中国高技术产业分行业动态面板数据模型的检验[J].世界经济研究,2011(5):51-56. 被引量:40

二级参考文献147

共引文献152

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部