摘要
基础主义与融贯主义是相互竞争的知识辩护理论。它们各有自身无法克服的难题。哈克认为基础主义和融贯主义之间存在其它知识辩护理论的逻辑空间,即存在一种融合基础主义和融贯主义的基础融贯主义理论。这种理论能够克服基础主义和融贯主义的难题。阐发基础融贯主义的关键是区分信念状态与信念内容。但这种区分实际上并没有成功地支持哈克的理论。哈克的基础融贯主义本质上仍是一种基础主义。哈克理论不成功的根源在于它继承了个体主义和绝对真理知识观。
Foundationalism and coherentism are competing theories of epistemic justification. They have respective problems that cannot be overcome. Susan Haack thinks there are logical space for another theory of epistemic justification between fundamentalism and coherentism. In other words,there is a foundherentism theory that integrates fundamentalism and coherentism. This theory can overcome problems of fundamentalism and coherentism. The key is to distinguish S- belief( state of belief) and C- belief( content of belief) to elucidate her foundherentism. But actually,this distinction cannot support Haack 's theory successfully. Essentially,Haack 's foundherentism is still a foundationalism. Haack's theory is unsuccessful because it inherits views of individualistic knowledge and absolute truth.
出处
《嘉应学院学报》
2015年第9期27-32,共6页
Journal of Jiaying University