期刊文献+

喀斯特地区4种植被模式生态系统服务评价 被引量:1

Evaluating ecosystem services of four vegetation types in Karst areas
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用网络分析法(ANP)对广西平果喀斯特地区任豆、香椿、吊丝竹、灌丛4种植被模式的生态系统服务进行了评价。评价体系包括6个准则(生物多样性、获利情况、调节能力、保护潜力、景观美学、文化历史价值)和9个选项方案。采用样地调查、问卷调查方法,借助Super Decision软件进行数据处理,得到各指标的权重得分。结果表明,以生态系统服务为总目标的评价中,得分顺序为香椿林>吊丝竹林>任豆林>灌丛。评价指标中对生态系统服务总得分影响最大的是竹木产品价值和总生物量。 Four vegetation types in Karst areas in Pingguo,Guangxi were investigated to evaluate their ecosystem services by Analytic Network Process( ANP). The model contained 6 criteria( biodiversity,profitability,regulation,protection,scenic beauty,culture and history value) and 9 alternatives. Super Decision 2. 2 was used in the process to synthesize the scores of data from sampled plots and questionnaires. The results showed that with respect to the goal of ecosystem services,the order of scores was Toona sinensis forest Dendrocalamopsis minor forest Zenia insignis forest shrubs. Forest product values and total biomass contributed the most to the scores in the evaluation.
出处 《林业科技开发》 北大核心 2015年第6期139-143,共5页 China Forestry Science and Technology
基金 广西科技攻关重大项目(桂科攻14124004-3-11) 中央财政林业科技推广示范项目(2013-TG10)
关键词 网络分析法 喀斯特 生态系统服务 得分 问卷调查 Analytic Network Process Karst ecosystem services score questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1庞世龙,杨耀波,莫汉宁,蓝宏珠,侯远瑞.广西任豆优树选择标准研究[J].林业科技开发,2013,27(6):14-17. 被引量:3
  • 2Fontana V, Radtke A, Fedrigotti V B, et al. Comparing land-use al- ternatives : Using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-crite- ria decision analysis [ J ]. Ecological Economics,2013,93 : 128-136.
  • 3Costanza R, Fisher B, Ali S, et al. An integrative approach to quality of life measurement, research, and policy [ J ]. Surveys and Perspec- tives Integrating Environment and Society,2008,1 (1) :16-21.
  • 4Koschke L,Fttrst C,Frank S,et al. A multi-criteria approach for an inte- grated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning[ J]. Ecological Indicators ,2012,21:54-66.
  • 5Parra-L6pez C, Calatrava-Requena J, de-Haro-Gim~nez T. A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alterna- tive olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework[ J]. Eco-logical Economics,2008,64(4) :820-834.
  • 6Ananda J, Herath G. A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning [ J ]. Ecological Economics, 2009,68 ( 10 ) : 2535 -2548.
  • 7Xu W, Khoshroo N, Bjornlund H, et al. Effects of "grain for green" re- forestation program on rural sustainability in China: an AHP approach to peasant consensus of public land use policies [ J ]. Stochastic Envi- ronmental Research and Risk Assessment,2014,28(4) :867-880.
  • 8Wolfslehner B, Vaeik H, Lexer M J. Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management[ J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2005,207 ( 1/2 ) : 157-170.
  • 9Wang N J, Bao Y Q. Modeling forest quality at stand level: A case study of loess plateau in China [ J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2011,13 (6) :488-495.
  • 10Diaz-Baheiro L, Romero C. Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: A review and an assessment[ J]. Forest Ecology and Manage- ment,2008,255 ( 8/9 ) :3222-3241.

二级参考文献104

共引文献143

同被引文献53

引证文献1

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部