期刊文献+

非期望刺激的生态意义信息对无意视盲的影响:情绪效价和精细程度的作用 被引量:2

The Effect of Ecological Significance to Unexpected Stimuli on Inattentional Blindness: The Role of Emotional Valence and Fine Degree
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用Most(2000)的持续动态的实验范式,以圆圈、抽象面孔和真实面孔为非期望刺激,研究其生态意义信息对无意视盲的影响。研究发现:(1)相对于正性面孔和中性面孔,被试对负性面孔作为非期望刺激时的觉察率更高;而对正性面孔和中性面孔作为非期望刺激时的觉察率无显著性差异;(2)相对于圆圈,抽象面孔和真实面孔作为非期望刺激的觉察率更高,而抽象面孔与真实面孔作为非期望刺激时的觉察率均无显著性差异。结果表明,负性的、精细的非期望刺激的无意视盲率更低,即生态意义信息强的非期望刺激更易捕获注意。 This study adopts the sustained IB paradigm from Most S B( 2000). This study takes circles,abstract faces( positive,neutral and negative faces) and real faces( positive,neutral and negative,and the balance of the gender effect) as unexpected stimuli,to study the effect of ecology on IB. The experimental findings are as following:( 1) Compared to the positive faces and neutral ones,awareness rate of subjects is significantly higher than negative faces as unexpected stimuli; while awareness rate to positive faces and neutral faces is not much different.( 2) Relative to circles,the awareness rate to abstract faces and real faces as unexpected stimuli is higher,while awareness rate to the abstract faces and real faces is not much different. In a word,the IB rate of negative and fine unexpected stimuli is lower,namely unexpected stimuli of strong ecological significance more easily captures attention.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期661-667,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题(DEA130242) 宁波大学学科项目(XKW141010)
关键词 无意视盲 非期望刺激 生态意义信息 注意捕获 inattentional blindness unexpected stimulus ecological sighificance attention capture
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Anderson, A. K. , Christoff, K. , Panitz, D. , DeRosa, E. , & Gabrie- li, J. D. E. (2003). Neural correlates of the automatic processing of threat facial signals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23 ( 13 ), 5627 - 5635.
  • 2Blanchard, D. C., & Blanchard, R. J. (1988). Ethoexperimental ap- proaches to the biology of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 39 (12), 43 -68.
  • 3Bentin, S., Allison, T., & Puce, A. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuro- science, 8(10), 551 -565.
  • 4Charash, M. , Mckay, D. (2002). Attention bias for disgust. Journal of Anxiety Disordors, 16(5 ) , 529 - 541.
  • 5Catherine, J. , Mondloch, D. M. , & Sara, A. (2006). Becoming a Face Expert. Psychological science, 17( 11 ), 930.
  • 6Carretie, L. , Hinojosa, J. A. , Lopez-Marttn, S. , Albert, J. , Tapia, M. , & Pozo, M. A. (2009). Danger is worse when it moves: Neural and behavioral indices of enhanced attentional capture by dynamic threatening stimuli. Neuropsychologia, 47(2 ), 364 - 369.
  • 7Crawford, M., & Masterson, F. A. (1982). Species-specific defense reactions and avoidance learning. An evaluative review. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 17(4), 204 -214.
  • 8Catz, O. , Kampf, M. , Nachson, N. , & Babkoff, H. (2009). Form theory to implementation: Building a multidimensional space for face recognition. Acta psychology, 131 (2), 143 - 152.
  • 9Daniel, M. (2006). The effects of eye movements, age, and expertise on inattentional blindness. Consciousness and Cognition, 101 ( 15 ) , 620 - 627.
  • 10Daniel, M. , & Franz,J. B. (2012). Improvement of classical first-or- der adjoint sensitivity relations. PAMM, 102 (17) : 627 - 628.

二级参考文献66

共引文献31

同被引文献8

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部