期刊文献+

基于期望安全车距的车辆跟驰行为分析与仿真 被引量:8

Car-following behavior analysis and simulation based on expectation safety distance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解释实际道路交通流中的跟车距离差异,引入期望及参照点理论,提出期望安全车距(ESD)概念,分析其主要影响因素。采用C#编程模拟车辆跟驰行为,以跟车距离的试验值作为ESD的代表值,从横向角度考察ESD的个体差异,分析性别及实际驾龄对ESD的影响,并采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)方法对比分析不同驾驶类型间的差异。数据显示:驾驶人ESD的个体差异较大,性别对ESD有一定影响,实际驾龄对ESD的影响无明显规律。ANOVA分析表明:驾驶类型对ESD有极大影响(P<0.001)。ESD是驾驶人判断车距是否安全的参考点,是导致实际跟车距离存在差异的主要原因。 For the sake of explaining car-following distance differences in the actual road traffic flow,expectancy theory and reference point theory were introduced,then a concept of ESD was proposed and main factors affecting ESD were analyzed. Car-following behavior was simulated by C# computer programming. Experimental value of car-following distance was used as the representative value of ESD. Individual differences in ESD were examined. Influences of gender and actual driving experience on ESD were analyzed. Differences among different driving types were analyzed by one-way ANOVA method. The data show that ESD varies obviously among individual drivers,gender has some influence on ESD,and that the influence of actual driving experience on ESD has no obvious rule. The ANOVA result shows that driving type has a very significant influence on ESD( P〈0. 001),and that ESD is a reference point for drivers to judge whether the vehicle distance is safe,and the main cause for differences in actual car-following distance.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期91-95,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
关键词 交通工程 期望安全车距(ESD) 车辆跟驰 参照点 单因素方差分析(ANOVA) traffic engineering expectation safety distance(ESD) car-following reference point one-way analysis of variance(One-Way ANOVA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1陆建,李亚平,杨海飞.专业及非专业驾驶人跟驰安全特性评价[J].交通信息与安全,2014,32(5):25-29. 被引量:4
  • 2曾友志,张宁,刘利娟.考虑司机扰动风险偏好异质的跟驰模型[J].物理学报,2014,63(6):374-380. 被引量:4
  • 3王殿海,金盛.车辆跟驰行为建模的回顾与展望[J].中国公路学报,2012,25(1):115-127. 被引量:89
  • 4Marsden G, Brackstone M, Mcdonald M, et al. A comparison of differing driving populations using the ICC FOT classifi- cation scheme[C]. Proceedings of 82"d Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2003: 12-16.
  • 5Piao J, Mcdonald M. Low speed car following behaviour from floating vehicle data[C].Proceedings of 2003 IEEE Intelli- gent Vehicles Symposium, 2003:462 - 467.
  • 6Kim Taehyung. Analysis of variability in car-following behavior over long-term driving maneuvers[ D]. Maryland : Univer- sity of Maryland, 2005.
  • 7Taieb-maimon M, Shinar D. Minimum and comfortable driving headways: Reality versus perception [J]. Human Factors, 2001, 43 ( 1 ) : 159 - 172.
  • 8赵炜华,王丽华,叶飞,刘浩学.驾驶人所处环境照度对视认距离影响[J].交通信息与安全,2013,31(6):11-16. 被引量:13
  • 9Ossen S, Hoogendoorn S. Car-following behavior analysis from microscopic trajectory data[J].Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005, 1934(1 ) :13 -21.
  • 10Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica, 1979, 47(2):263 -291.

二级参考文献71

共引文献115

同被引文献62

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部