期刊文献+

拟松材线虫组织蛋白酶基因Bmcath1的序列分析与转录水平检测

Bioinformatic and expression analysis of a cathepsin gene Bmcath1 in Bursaphelechus mucronatus
原文传递
导出
摘要 拟松材线虫组织蛋白酶基因Bmcath1是一个在松材线虫与拟松材线虫中差异表达的基因,为了解该基因的生物学功能,对Bmcath1基因进行了生物信息学分析。笔者使用BioEdit、SignalP 4.1、BLASTP、MEGA 4.0等软件对Bmcath1基因进行了生物信息学分析,发现Bmcath1 cDNA序列全长1 294 bp,含有一个长度为1 158 bp的开放阅读框。由Bmcath1基因编码的蛋白质CATH1含有386个氨基酸,分子质量为4238 ku,等电点为8.52。蛋白质CATH1存在一个Peptidase_C1A subfamily功能域结构,在不同物种上的氨基酸序列多样性丰富。采用Real-Time PCR方法对不同培养方式获得的拟松材线虫中Bmcath1基因的表达量进行检测,发现该基因在分离自黑松的拟松材线虫中高量表达,据此推测拟松材线虫Bmcath1基因可能在线虫处于松树体内生长、繁殖时发挥更为重要的作用。 Cathepsin geneBmcath1 ofBursaphelenchus mucronatusis differentially expressed betweenB. xylophilusandB. mucronatus. In order to understand its biological function, bioinformational analysis was conducted using software Bi-oEdit, SignalP 4.1, BLASTP and MEGA 4. 0. The result showed that the full-length cDNA ofBmcath1 was 1 294 bplong, which included an ORF of 1 158 bp. The deduced amino sequence of CATH1 contained 386 amino acids with mo-lecular mass of 42.38 ku and pI of 8.52. Protein CATH1 contained a Peptidase-C1 A conserved domain. The amino se-quences of cathepsins varied between different species. With the method of real-time PCR, gene expression profilingshowed thatBmcath1 expressed much more inB. mucronatusseparated fromPinus thunbergiiseedlings comparing withexpression level ofBmcath1 in monoxenic culture nematodes. The result suggested that function ofBmcath1 may be relat-ed to infection process ofB. mucronatus.
出处 《南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第6期12-16,共5页 Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31270683) 江苏高校自然科学研究重大项目(11KJA220002) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
关键词 拟松材线虫 组织蛋白酶 系统发育树 表达谱分析 Bursaphelenchus mucronatus cathepsin phylogenetic tree gene expression profiling
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献13

  • 1胡凯基,王秋丽,杨宝君.松材线虫和拟松材线虫不同株系致病性的研究[J].林业科学研究,1994,7(4):381-385. 被引量:24
  • 2徐福元,席客,徐刚,周元生,许文力,徐克勤,葛明宏.不同龄级马尾松对松材线虫病抗性的探讨[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1994,18(3):27-33. 被引量:43
  • 3程瑚瑞.拟松材线虫的形态诊断和致病性研究[J].南京农业大学学报,1986,(2):55-61.
  • 4杨宝君.不同松树品种对松材线虫的抗性[J].植物病理学报,1987,7(4):211-214.
  • 5胡凯基 杨宝君 等.松材线虫和拟松材线虫不同株系致病性研究.中国松材线虫病的流行与治理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1995.50-54.
  • 6Braasch H,Caroppo S,Ambrogioni L,et al.1998.Pathogenicity of various Bursaphlenchus species to pines and implication to European forests//Futai K,Togashi K,Ikeda T.Sustainability of pine forests in relation to pine wilt and decline.Tokyo:Proceedings of International Symposium,Tokyo,26-30 October 1998,14-19.
  • 7Futai K.1980.Population dynamics of Bursahelenchus lignicolus (Nematoda:Aphelenchoididae) and Bursaphelenchus mucronatus in pine seedling.Appl Ent Zool,15:458-464.
  • 8Mamiya Y,Enda N.1979.Bursaphelenchus mucronatus (Nematode:Aphelenchoidiae) from pine-wood and its biology and patholgenicity to pine tree.Nematologica,25:353-361.
  • 9Mc Manara D G,Stoen M.1988.A survey for Bursaphelenchus spp.in pine forests in Norway.EPPO-Bulletin,18:353-363.
  • 10黄悦悦,任泽君,曹红珍,李振华,钱中.德兴市马尾松枯死树中的拟松材线虫致病性测定[J].江西林业科技,1999(1):9-10. 被引量:14

共引文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部